Skip to content

Montana · Nonprofit

YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL

YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL (Montana) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,704,890 to it, the largest being THE BUNTING FAMILY FOUNDATION ($297,000). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$411k
Funders on record
26
Grants received
$1.7M
Net assets
$142k
17/26 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 86%
01What it does

What Yaak Valley Forest Council does

Mission

Working for a wild yaak through science, education, and bold action.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The highlight of our work over the last year was our success defending black ram in court. The black ram project encompasses over 95,000 acres of the northern yaak valley and proposes logging in 4,000 acres of mature and old-growth forest within designated grizzly core habitat. After seven years of engagement and advocacy, a federal judge ruled in our favor finding that the kootenai national forest (knf) violated at least six laws in their proposal. The knf has since appealed the decision and so once again we are working with our national partners to prepare for the next phase of this case, which will involve extensive ground-truthing. We are committed to protecting this vital forest and continue to lay the groundwork for permanently protecting this climate-resilient, carbon-storing habitat as a climate refuge. Yvfc hosted many events to bring national attention to the yaak valley and increase awareness of the climate refuge. In june, we hosted ada limn, poet laureate of the united states. She wrote about her experience in her poem "the origin, revisited," which was published in the atlantic and later read to president and first lady biden by limn. We also partnered with ecoflight…

    $301,696 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. Forest watch community forest watch: yvfc's presence on the ground as a voice for conservation has been crucial to maintaining high-quality habitat on the landscape. The knf has continued to move forward with logging projects that impact climate-resilient old-growth forests and critical grizzly bear habitat. As we know, maintaining old and mature forests, specifically within the yaak valley's inland temperate rainforest, is the most cost- effective way to store carbon in the landscape while preserving ecosystem function. Yvfc has engaged on four projects: black ram, knotty pine, norman mccedar (libby), and trojan defense (troy). For each project, we conducted ground monitoring, assessing potential impacts on watershed health, sensitive species, wildfire risk to the community, and climate impacts. Grizzly recovery: we continue to monitor illegal motor vehicle use in the knf, where despite agency claims that designated grizzly core habitat is sufficiently protected, yvfc continues to document illicit use. During the 2023 field season, yvfc assessed road barriers at more than 30 sites across six knf project areas and produced formal reports for three projects. Each report has been…

  3. Headwaters restoration partnership on the ground in the yaak valley, our field crew continued long-term programs, working with agency and community partners to assess water quality, monitor stream temperatures, and detect the presence of aquatic invasive species. Over the 2023 season, our crew conducted testing for aquatic invasive species throughout the kootenai river watershed, confirming that the yaak river remains free of invasives. In partnership with the university of montana's flathead lake biological station, we tested 22 locations in the watershed for key indicators of water quality. Our monitoring expanded to include selenium testing at six sites. Yvfc's independent testing confirmed that selenium levels in koocanusa reservoir and the kootenai river are near the maximum allowed by the epa, posing a serious threat to aquatic species. Private land restoration: yvfc's private land restoration program made significant progress toward addressing nonpoint source pollution in the south fork of the yaak river, one of the few impaired waterways in the yaak valley. Our staff 2023 big sky watershed crop member conducted comprehensive erosion surveys on the entire south fork river…

  4. Conservation education conservation education: yvfc attended more than 30 events during 2023, where we advocated for sustainable land management, offered bear spray training, and educated the community about how to stop the spread of aquatic invasive species. We held presentations at two local schools and hosted two wildness walks, which were well attended. We also organized the second annual lincoln county city nature challenge bioblitz, where our community made 126 observations and documented 78 species. Bear aware: over the year, we spoke with hundreds of people about the importance of securing bear attractants, carrying bear spray, and engaging ethically with bears. We partnered with the troy high school outdoor club to organize a bear spray demonstration for students and their families and conducted over 30 trainings at community events. Our program to provide bear-safe garbage cans and electric fencing to yaak valley residents is more popular than ever. In 2023 we were contacted by over 30 people seeking assistance and were able to offer four electric fence energizers and eight garbage cans. We are happy to report that yvfc has welcomed long-time board member and staunch…

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $301,696.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($280k) Expenses 100 ($260k) Net assets 100 ($108k)2018 Revenue 85 ($237k) Expenses 101 ($262k) Net assets 77 ($83k)2019 Revenue 135 ($379k) Expenses 145 ($376k) Net assets 79 ($85k)2020 Revenue 140 ($391k) Expenses 127 ($329k) Net assets 136 ($147k)2021 Revenue 110 ($307k) Expenses 149 ($386k) Net assets 63 ($68k)2022 Revenue 144 ($402k) Expenses 132 ($343k) Net assets 118 ($127k)2023 Revenue 169 ($474k) Expenses 163 ($422k) Net assets 166 ($179k)2024 Revenue 147 ($411k) Expenses 172 ($448k) Net assets 131 ($142k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (147)Expenses (172)Net assets (131)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $150k to $73k (−52%).

$108k
$84k
$101k
$150k
$73k
$132k
$186k
$150k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 17% · 2020 10% · 2021 11% · 2022 1% · 2023 6% · 2024 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$20k
’17
−$25k
’18
$2k
’19
$61k
’20
−$78k
’21
$59k
’22
$52k
’23
−$37k
’24
4.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed55773554
Joined·+1+3+2+1+2+3+3
No longer listed·1125034
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $35k → $330k.

4 of 26 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

17%
largest funder
43%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 29% · 2018 32% · 2019 32% · 2020 34% · 2021 20% · 2022 32% · 2023 38% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

35% of YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL draws 89% of its grant income from funders outside Montana, across 13 states in all.

WA
MT
MI
NY
NV
CA
CO
MD
DE
AZ
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Montana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $115k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL's funding base is broadening — from 6 funders to 10 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $34k on record.

Federal$34k
grants $34kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$34k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 7%Fundraising 15%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL?
YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL (Montana) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,704,890 to it, the largest being THE BUNTING FAMILY FOUNDATION ($297,000). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 26 organizations giving $1,704,890 in grants to YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL?
THE BUNTING FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $297,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like YAAK VALLEY FOREST COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Yaak Valley Forest Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 26 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing