Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

World Bank Community Connections Fund

To provide the world bank group employees and retirees with an opportunity to support nonprofit organizations that work to improve the quality of life of people and communities.

$458k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

International$7.4MFood & Nutrition$2.7MHuman Services$2.6MHealth$2.5MHousing & Shelter$1.8MEducation$1.3MEnvironment$1.0MArts & Culture$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$200,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$100,000
LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES$100,000
ARLINGTON FOOD ASSISTANCE CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ATD FOURTH WORLD MOVEMENT: $18k → 32%BIKES FOR THE WORLD: $27k → 7%BIKES FOR THE WORLD: $25k → 7%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $65k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $37k → 14%ALTERNATIVE HOUSE: $22k → 6%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND: $20k → 19%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $26k → 14%BIKES FOR THE WORLD: $41k → 8%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $65k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $64k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $58k → 14%FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $22k → 7%FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $23k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION: $26k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION: $24k → 6%EDUCARE DC: $66k → 14%EDUCARE OF WASHINGTON DC: $65k → 14%SECOND STORY: $100k → 6%EDUCARE OF WASHINGTON DC: $61k → 14%BETHESDA CARES: $32k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $29k → 8%BETHESDA CARES: $29k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $89k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $88k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $76k → 14%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $18k → 8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $18k → 8%AYUDA: $22k → 14%AYUDA: $17k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE GREATER WASHINGTON: $100k → 14%FAIR CHANCE: $40k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $168k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $130k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $86k → 14%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $26k → 14%ASIAN AMERIAN LEAD: $50k → 14%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $25k → 14%AYUDA: $24k → 14%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $19k → 14%STREET SENSE: $23k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $48k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $42k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $41k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $28k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $18k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of World Bank Community Connections Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

World Bank Community Connections Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 223 repeat orgs$502k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

223 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 220 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

223
37

Total granted

$23M
$402k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+17%

Still filing today

92%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +98%
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSPARENCY FUND INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $911k · revenue +52% · 63% of their budget
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $910k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • FAIR CHANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +8%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER OF WASHINGTON DC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • WA
    WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +66%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
8
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
9
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
10
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
11
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven by three…

—
12
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dunstan Wai Memorial Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Child and Family ServicesHomeless Services & ShelterCommunity Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Professional Ballet Compani…Developmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…At-Risk Youth MentoringSenior Support ServicesYouth Development CentersYouth Sports Booster Organi…Asian American Advocacy & H…Lgbtq+ Community CentersHospice Care ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringClassical Music EnsemblesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Education Equity LeadershipCommunity Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Senior LivingAffordable Housing Developm…Jewish Community FederationsEarly Childhood Education C…Muslim Community Organizati…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Pregnancy Support ServicesSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Government Accountability R…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr18%33%20–35yr16%35%35–55yr15%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr16%44%35–55yr15%25%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%2/266
the rest of the field
13%
1,598/12,735

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

251 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 251 of the 266 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
62
Early backer (in before they grew)
245/251
Grantees still filing
203/251
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,466,489 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA I…PARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSPARENCY FUND INC — $910,688 · InternationalPARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSPARENCY F…International Rescue Committee INC — $536,103 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee…INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC — $447,572 · InternationalINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF F…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $306,155 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $296,533 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $235,270 · International+32 more — $2,140,492 · International+32 moreTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $497,802 · OtherTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INCSOME INC — $401,494 · OtherUS FUND FOR UNICEF — $344,566 · OtherSAVE THE CHILDREN — $304,746 · OtherCASA INC — $283,739 · OtherGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $270,111 · Other+77 more — $5,963,784 · Other+77 moreNEW FUTURES — $434,016 · Human ServicesNEW FUTURESCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $259,819 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHAR…EDUCARE DC — $191,557 · Human ServicesEDUCARE DCMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $186,794 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITC…ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC — $156,641 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HO…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $130,525 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT — $128,029 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC — $120,499 · Human Services+26 more — $1,231,438 · Human Services+26 moreCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $910,099 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL ARE…MARTHA'S TABLE INC — $502,686 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TA…BREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $443,792 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR T…Arlington Food Assistance Center — $163,350 · Food & NutritionArlington F…LA COCINA VA — $155,281 · Food & NutritionLA COCINA V…MARTHA'S TABLE SO INC — $100,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $40,162 · Food & NutritionPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC — $521,659 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $246,299 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $169,675 · HealthWHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC — $165,195 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $124,609 · HealthLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC — $82,076 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $65,265 · Health+13 more — $481,122 · HealthHOUSE OF RUTH — $318,195 · Housing & ShelterFriendship Place — $202,954 · Housing & ShelterGood Shepherd Housing & Family Services Inc — $186,926 · Housing & ShelterDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $167,047 · Housing & ShelterCALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $140,219 · Housing & ShelterChrist House — $96,038 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL UNION MISSION — $46,668 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $24,643 · Housing & ShelterAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $365,030 · EducationDunstan Wai Memorial Charitable Foundation — $218,234 · EducationA WIDER CIRCLE INC — $121,505 · EducationCOLLEGETRACKS INC — $108,147 · EducationEDU-FUTURO — $75,758 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $52,207 · EducationREADING PARTNERS — $40,505 · Education+2 more — $62,743 · Education
International$6,339,302Other$8,066,242Human Services$2,839,318Food & Nutrition$2,315,370Health$1,855,900Housing & Shelter$1,182,690Education$1,044,129

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,466,489 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSPARENCY FUND INC — $910,688 over 3y, 63% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $910,099 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $536,103 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC — $521,659 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $502,686 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $497,802 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC — $447,572 over 3y, 12% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $443,792 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEW FUTURES — $434,016 over 4y, 12% of budgetSOME INC — $401,494 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $365,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH — $318,195 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $306,155 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $296,533 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA INC — $283,739 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $270,111 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIslamic American Zakat Foundation Inc — $261,058 over 4y, 36% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $259,819 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $246,299 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $235,270 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDunstan Wai Memorial Charitable Foundation — $218,234 over 3y, 81% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $218,189 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriendship Place — $202,954 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $200,739 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc — $197,720 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $196,933 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FUND OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — $194,595 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetEDUCARE DC — $191,557 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC — $187,722 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Housing & Family Services Inc — $186,926 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $186,794 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA — $175,739 over 3y, 20% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $169,675 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $167,047 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetWHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC — $165,195 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center — $163,350 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC — $160,793 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetLIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES — $159,183 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $158,406 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC — $156,641 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetLA COCINA VA — $155,281 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $144,576 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $143,375 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $140,901 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $140,219 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetLUCKY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE — $137,330 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $137,164 over 3y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Nat…Greater Washington Co…The Morris and Gwendo…Philip L Graham Fund …Clark-Winchcole Found…John Edward Fowler Me…William S Abell Found…Eugene & Agnes E Meye…Dimick Foundation Joh…Clark Charitable Foun…Venable Foundation IncAmerica's Charities
United Way of the National Capital AreaVA117.4× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Venable Foundation Inc · America's Charities

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization World Bank Community Connections Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bethesda Cares Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Adventist Development & Relief Agency International — 35% of income from government
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
  • The Montgomery County Coalition for the Homeless Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Anacostia Watershed Society Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
  • St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families — 6% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Capital Hospice — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
56report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to World Bank Community Connections Fund?

Find your warmest path to World Bank Community Connections Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 266 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home