· Public charity
World Bank Community Connections Fund
To provide the world bank group employees and retirees with an opportunity to support nonprofit organizations that work to improve the quality of life of people and communities.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK | $200,000 |
| MARTHA'S TABLE | $100,000 |
| LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES | $100,000 |
| ARLINGTON FOOD ASSISTANCE CENTER | $50,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 100% of World Bank Community Connections Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 0%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.
223 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 220 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2017–2026 · $1.5M · revenue +98%- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSPARENCY FUND INC3× · 2017–2019 · $911k · revenue +52% · 63% of their budget
- CACAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC7× · 2017–2026 · $910k · revenue +80%
Funded once
FAIR CHANCEone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +8%- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER OF WASHINGTON DCone grant, 2017 · $20k
- WAWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +66%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
The institute for state effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through…
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven by three…
How this is measured
251 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 251 of the 266 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSPARENCY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Islamic American Zakat Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds Dunstan Wai Memorial Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Friendship Place ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FUND OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds EDUCARE DC ↗
- Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Housing & Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds WHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Venable Foundation Inc · America's Charities
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization World Bank Community Connections Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from World Bank Community Connections Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bethesda Cares Inc: 100% of income from government
- Adventist Development & Relief Agency International: 35% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc: 19% of income from government
- The Montgomery County Coalition for the Homeless Inc: 19% of income from government
- Anacostia Watershed Society Inc: 15% of income from government
- Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
- Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
- St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: 6% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
- Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
- Capital Hospice: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to World Bank Community Connections Fund?
Find your warmest path to World Bank Community Connections Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on World Bank Community Connections’ filings →