· Public charity
United Charitable
To grow and support each charitable journey by providing simple customized vehicles that fulfill your philanthropic endeavors by administering donor-advised funds and fiscally sponsored programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 195 grants below total $7,888,553 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,294,386 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,405,833 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k63 grants · $430k
- $10k–50k117 grants · $2.0M
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+3 grants · $4.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MITCHELL THORP FOUNDATION | $3,479,862 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $419,800 |
| NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| THE GIFFORD FLORIDA YOUTH ORCHESTRA INCORPORATED | $225,413 |
| FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE & RACISM INC | $182,566 |
| CHABAD OF BAKERSFIELD INC | $180,000 |
| NATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION | $100,500 |
| VIENNA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $100,008 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $100,000 |
| MOBILIZE LOVE | $100,000 |
| MERCY CHURCH | $100,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC | $55,238 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $53,340 |
| CHANGE OUR FUTURE FOUNDATION | $52,458 |
| ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 11% of United Charitable’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
241 repeat relationships — 122 still active in FY2024, 119 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MTMitchell Thorp Foundation4× · 2018–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +445% · 59% of their budget
- NHNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2024 · $514k · revenue +17%
- TGTHE GIFFORD FLORIDA YOUTH ORCHESTRA2× · 2023–2024 · $292k · revenue +170% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- LCLEGACY CHURCH INCone grant, 2023 · $7.6M
- EGELOCEN GROUP FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $171k · revenue -84% · 100% of their budget
- PCPARAGON CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE INTERNATIONALone grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
The mission of advocate health care is to serve the health needs of individuals, families and communities through a wholistic philosophy rooted in our fundamental understanding of human beings as created in the image of god.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jack R Anderson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
412 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 412 of the 610 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mitchell Thorp Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE & RACISM INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wheaton College ↗
- Who funds THE GIFFORD FLORIDA YOUTH ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds MASTER'S ACADEMY OF VERO BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds RESET180 ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds ELOCEN GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CORAM DEO ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Far Reaching Ministries ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HIGHER GOOD ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds CHANGE A LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHARITABLE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Jack R Anderson Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Timothy and Sheila Patton Family Charitable Trust · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Catholic Foundation of Michigan · United Way of Washtenaw County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Protection Center Inc — 8% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Hun School of Princeton — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.