Arizona · Nonprofit
The Animal League of Green Valley
The Animal League of Green Valley (Arizona) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $229,079 to it, the largest being VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ($59,500). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $1.8M
- Funders on record
- 16
- Grants received
- $229k
- Net assets
- $7.7M
What The Animal League of Green Valley does
Mission
TALGV's mission is 1) to provide compassionate care, shelter, training, adoption opportunities, emotional support, and medical care, including spaying and neutering, for needy and homeless cats and dogs in Green Valley and surrounding areas, by carefully managing donated funds and volunteer talents; 2) to raise awareness and funding for TALGV through the profitable managing of the Attic Thrift Store; 3) to reduce the number of unwanted pets through subsidized spay/neuter programs and education; 4) to collaborate with other animal agencies to help animals find a place to call home.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Animal Care Services:All of the resources of The Animal League of Green Valley go towards caring for shelter animals and helping people of limited financial means care for their pets.Animals taken in: 566 cats, 379 dogs, total 945Animals going out:Adoptions 502 cats, 317 dogs, total 819Other 60 cats, 46 dogs, total 106Total going out 562 cats, 363 dogs, total 925Note that it is possible to adopt out more animals than were taken in because some animals remained from the previous year and some were born at The Animal League.The Animal League incurred the following expenses to treat and care for the animals in its shelter:Contracted Veterinary Services TALGV (in house) $29,623Veterinary Care TALGV (in house) $87,037Payroll Animal Care TALGV (in house) $56,435Payroll Tax Animal Care TALGV (in house) $4,282Pharmaceutical TALGV (in house) $107,778Total MEDICAL EXPENSES TALGV (IN HOUSE) $285,155
$608,350 spent$77,487 earned by the program79% of program spendingFinancial Assistance (Outreach):Some of the resources of The Animal League of Green Valley go towards helping people with limited financial means care for their pets.Expenses incurred for MEDICAL OUTREACH:Spay and Neuter Outreach $28,919Veterinary Care Outreach $44,268Pharmaceutical Outreach $0Medical Outreach-Customer Co-Pay ($501)Total MEDICAL OUTREACH $72,686
$72,686 spent9% of program spendingFinancial Assistance to People who have adopted pets from TALGV (Medical Vet Care for Life and Medical Vet Care Support and Post Adoption Support):Some of the resources of the Animal League of Green Valley go towards helping owners of pets adopted from TALGV pay for medical expenses.Post Adoption Support (net) $1,675Medical Vet Care for Life $83,772
$85,448 spent11% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $766,484.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $4.4M to $5.6M (+26%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 5% · 2018 6% · 2019 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
89% of The Animal League of Green Valley’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (74% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 7 funders, grant income fell $30k → $26k.
9 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 75% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of The Animal League of Green Valley’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
The Animal League of Green Valley has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund The Animal League of Green Valley.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 66% · 2018 81% · 2019 99% · 2020 83% · 2021 73% · 2022 34% · 2023 46% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
33% of The Animal League of Green Valley's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
75% of The Animal League of Green Valley's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $58k that is directly attributable, 93% of it comes from funders outside Arizona, across 6 states.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $172k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
The Animal League of Green Valley runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,559 animals nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,559 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like The Animal League of Green Valley
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arizona
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
77% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
59%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for The Animal League of Green Valley: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds The Animal League of Green Valley?
- The Animal League of Green Valley (Arizona) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $229,079 to it, the largest being VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ($59,500). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does The Animal League of Green Valley have?
- IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $229,079 in grants to The Animal League of Green Valley, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of The Animal League of Green Valley?
- VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM is the largest funder on record, with $59,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like The Animal League of Green Valley find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Animal League of Green Valley →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing