Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

ST JOSEPH'S VILLA

ST JOSEPH'S VILLA (Virginia) receives grants from 88 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,326,844 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ($1,942,895). 56 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$26M
Funders on record
88
Grants received
$12M
Net assets
$26M
56/88 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%
01What it does

What St Joseph's Villa does

Mission

The mission of st. Joseph's villa is to provide children with special needs and their families the opportunity to succeed through effective and innovative programs.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Children's educational services is comprised of dooley school at st. Joseph's villa, dooley center for alternative education, and career and transition services. Dooley school at st. Joseph's villa ended the school year having served 54 students from 16 different localities. One dooley student earned an applied studies diploma. Three students were successfully returned to public school. Also, students continued to participate in both fall and spring sports with the richmond alternative schools sports league. Throughout the school year students participated in college tours, virginia commonwealth university's focus inquiry program and various other enriching experiences provided by career and transition services. Dcae the dooley center for alternative education (dcae) closed out the 2023-24 academic year on a high note, proudly celebrating the achievements of its students, including a successful graduation. This year, the program expanded its enrollment to 38 students, with 35 successfully transitioning back to public school and 3 students set to return in the fall, evidence of the program's impact and growth. Throughout the school year, dcae equipped students with cutting-edge…

    $3,797,782 spent$3,728,434 earned by the program
    19% of program spending
  2. Day treatment school based: provides therapeutic services to children public school. Also, students continued to participate in both fall and spring sports with the richmond alternative schools sports league. Finally, students could participate in college tours and other activities through career and transition services. The dooley center for alternative education ended the 2024-2025 school and adolescents whose behaviors make them at risk of being taken out of their homes and schools. The children learn strategies to manage their behaviors to maintain in their school and/or home. The program will use psychotherapeutic interventions combined with education and mentalmental health treatment. Clients in the program will receive a variety of services including, but not limited to: group therapy, individual therapy, educational groups, and recreation. The program's goals are: (1) developing more effective social, coping, and daily living skills, as well as improved communication and adaptive behaviors to improve interpersonal skills. (2) enhancing functional level (3) to improve community awareness and give opportunities for community integration.intensive in-home services (iihs): our…

    $1,351,314 spent$1,054,174 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  3. Developmental disabilitiesthe sarah dooley center for autism served 87 students from 20 school divisions across the central virginia region during the year. Six students successfully graduated from the program, and more than ten new students were enrolled. Students demonstrated meaningful academic and functional growth, mastering 136 long-term goals and 4,153 short-term objectives, and collectively acquiring more than 14,000 new words. Average student attendance for the year was 90 percent. In addition to academic programming, students participated in over 1,000 community-based outings designed to build critical life and independence skills. Students also engaged in on-campus vocational opportunities, including participation in the villa coffee shop, and successfully transitioned back to public school settings. Through strong, collaborative relationships with school divisions and initiatives such as villa lobby day and legislative tours with delegates and senators, the program continued to highlight its impact while advocating for the students and families it serves. The conclusion of the year marked an important milestone with the program's official name change from the sarah…

    $8,401,551 spent$1,563,613 earned by the program
    41% of program spending
  4. Behavioral health services:behavioral health system is comprised of crisis services umbrella of the children's residential crisis stabilization unit (csu) and the youth crisis receiving center (crc). Crisis services. Csu is in partnership with rbha region 4 and is designed to divert the number of hospitalizations of youth ages 5-17 who experience mental health crisis for up to 15-day stays. Crc operates in partnership with henrico county and region 4 designed to provide immediate access to people in mental health crisis with rapid crisis assessment and warm hand-off to essential resources. Admissions to crc are tailored to youth ages 7-17 for various rapid assessments, clinical interventions, and relevant resources for next level of care depending on the level of stabilization. Youth may return home, be referred to on-going treatment such as the csu, or require hospitalization within a 23-hour time frame. Crisis stabilization unit (csu) served 92 unduplicated youth with a total of 95 admissions in fy25 and diverted 96% from hospitalization, with a total of 1,145 bed days. Youth served reside primarily in region 4, consisting of henrico county, city of richmond, chesterfield…

    $3,448,042 spent$1,459,940 earned by the program
    17% of program spending
  5. Community trainingin fy25, our community training program team of one staff member worked to improve the implementation of trauma-informed practices within the villa and its programs. All new employees in fy25 receive training in trauma and resilience. This program acts as an internal resource to programs and staff for quality improvement, behavioral management consultation, and systems change. External to the villa, we were in the community and trained over 4,100 individuals across 25 events and 79 hours in topics including trauma-informed care, workforce resilience, and mental health. This included 11 conferences, two of which were national, and travel to 5 states beyond virginia. Audiences included early childhood educators, mental health professionals, teams working in free clinics, those supporting housing efforts, foster care families, k-12 educators, and those working with incarceration diversion programs. This program team of one continues to represent the villa within many community organizations, committees, workgroups, area planning teams, and others aligned with our mission at the villa. We are working to advocate for the villa and those we serve through relationships…

    $131,713 spent$56,975 earned by the program
    1% of program spending
  6. Housing and homeless services flagler housing & homeless services provides assistance to households experiencing the crisis of homelessness. Services provided include information and referral, housing search, short-term rental assistance (rapid re-housing), case management, and youth specific housing and outreach. During fy 25, the flagler program (comprised of offices in richmond and petersburg) assisted 255 households, comprised of 488 individuals. These numbers represent an approximate decrease of 25% from fy 24. This reduction can be contributed to three factors: 1. A continued increase in the needs of the households that are served. Providers are needing to keep households open to services for a longer period to obtain and maintain housing stability. 2. Uncertainty and challenges presented by the new administration have resulted in the need to freeze client intakes and hiring on multiple occasions, resulting in a reduced number of households served, and 3. The loss of state permanent supportive housing (psh) funding resulted in this program being eliminated. Community based services are provided in two separate geographic regions; the greater richmond continuum of care…

    $3,300,768 spentof which $1,315,426 as grants
    16% of program spending
  7. Other

    $94,987 spent$56,576 earned by the program
    0% of program spending

The 7 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $20,526,157.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 100 ($16M) Net assets 100 ($14M)2018 Revenue 116 ($20M) Expenses 110 ($18M) Net assets 120 ($16M)2019 Revenue 122 ($21M) Expenses 119 ($19M) Net assets 137 ($19M)2020 Revenue 125 ($22M) Expenses 121 ($19M) Net assets 156 ($21M)2021 Revenue 129 ($23M) Expenses 119 ($19M) Net assets 182 ($25M)2022 Revenue 103 ($18M) Expenses 125 ($20M) Net assets 168 ($23M)2023 Revenue 109 ($19M) Expenses 132 ($21M) Net assets 153 ($21M)2024 Revenue 134 ($24M) Expenses 140 ($23M) Net assets 159 ($22M)2025 Revenue 148 ($26M) Expenses 154 ($25M) Net assets 189 ($26M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (148)Expenses (154)Net assets (189)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $23M to $30M (+32%).

$15M
$18M
$20M
$26M
$27M
$25M
$22M
$23M
$30M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 11% · 2018 7% · 2019 6% · 2020 6% · 2021 28% · 2022 21% · 2023 14% · 2024 13% · 2025 11%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

30% of ST JOSEPH'S VILLA’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,400 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.5M
’17
$2.7M
’18
$2.4M
’19
$2.6M
’20
$3.5M
’21
−$1.9M
’22
−$2.0M
’23
$1.1M
’24
$1.1M
’25
2.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jennifer Friar

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Kathleen C Duke

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed222121222219221923
Joined·+2+4+5+0+2+5+2+5
No longer listed·34405251
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 24 funders to 44 funders, grant income rose $1.5M → $1.8M.

8 of 88 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $9.8M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest St Joseph's Villa Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money ST JOSEPH'S VILLA raised.

From the IRS filings of ST JOSEPH'S VILLA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 88 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ST JOSEPH'S VILLA has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 16% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left

49% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ST JOSEPH'S VILLA.

16%
largest funder
32%
top three
~17
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 45% · 2019 25% · 2020 26% · 2021 21% · 2022 19% · 2023 18% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

55% of ST JOSEPH'S VILLA's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

80% of ST JOSEPH'S VILLA's grant income comes from Virginia funders.

WA
NY
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
DE
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ST JOSEPH'S VILLA runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,297 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · above the median
Months of reserve2.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,297 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding ST JOSEPH'S VILLA receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $8.1M on record.

Federal$8.1M
grants $8.1Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$8.1M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like ST JOSEPH'S VILLA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 15%Fundraising 3%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

VA

Part of a family of 4 related entities

  • St Joseph's Villa Foundation · exempt
  • St Joseph's Villa Housing Corp · exempt
  • Villa Corporation · exempt
  • Housing Success Center LLC · partnership

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ST JOSEPH'S VILLA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ST JOSEPH'S VILLA?
ST JOSEPH'S VILLA (Virginia) receives grants from 88 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,326,844 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ($1,942,895). 56 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ST JOSEPH'S VILLA have?
IRS filings report 88 organizations giving $12,326,844 in grants to ST JOSEPH'S VILLA, 56 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ST JOSEPH'S VILLA?
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,942,895 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ST JOSEPH'S VILLA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 88 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing