Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
282
Grants FY2024still arriving
38
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Civil Rights$625kEnvironment$318kPhilanthropy$303kFood & Nutrition$206kCrime & Legal$166kInternational$125kHuman Services$112kCommunity Improvement$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 282 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 282 grants below total $1,308,109 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,799,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $490,891 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k259 grants · $866k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$3,000
Median grant
38
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS FUND$100,000
SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST$50,000
HAWAII PEOPLE'S FUND$25,000
SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES/FLICKER FUND$25,000
NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$20,000
HIGHLANDER RESEARCH AND EDUCATION$20,000
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NY IDP$15,000
ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN CA$15,000
REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES$15,000
QUIXOTE CENTER$15,000
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE$12,000
CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND$12,000
HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND$12,000
NB3 NOTAH BEGAY III FOUNDATION$12,000
NATURAL RESOURCE COUNCIL OF MAINE$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $2k → 12%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 18%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $2k → 21%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD: $1k → 22%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND: $6k → 13%HUMANE BORDERS INC: $4k → 15%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $1k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $10k → 10%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $500 → 9%AL OTRO LADO INC: $5k → 14%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $2k → 17%COMMON GOOD SOUP KITCHEN COMMUNITY: $5k → 11%AL OTRO LADO INC: $4k → 14%CHILDREN NOW: $1k → 10%NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $5k → 17%AYUDA: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$672k · 98 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

98 repeat relationships — 98 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 174 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
183

Total granted

$672k
$812k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+24%

Still filing today

97%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $887k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24
EnvironmentInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND
    2× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +225%
  • FF
    FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +27%
  • RI
    REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES
    2× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC - COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -66%
  • TS
    THE SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC FLICKER FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
3
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
7
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
10
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
11
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
12
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum and the most unlike its peers is Ric OBarrys Dolphin Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterMilitary Veterans SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportSchool District FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Food PantriesCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number33%1%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr13%32%20–35yr9%37%35–55yr10%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value33%1%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr13%28%20–35yr9%40%35–55yr10%11%55yr+

The field is 33% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%2/338
the rest of the field
11%
1,086/9,670

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

325 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 325 of the 468 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
318/325
Grantees still filing
186/325
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CROSSROADS FUND — $100,000 · OtherCROSSROADS FUNDSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $50,000 · Other+122 more — $1,011,000 · Other+122 moreSpartanburg County Foundation — $30,000 · PhilanthropyAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND — $18,000 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $16,000 · PhilanthropyCHINOOK FUND INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $10,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropySEEDING JUSTICE — $8,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GLOBAL MOUNTAIN FUND — $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyFriends of Chikumbuso Inc — $5,000 · PhilanthropyNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $23,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $17,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $15,000 · Civil RightsSouthern Center for Human Rights — $13,000 · Civil RightsCIVIL RIGHTS CORPS — $12,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $12,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $10,000 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION — $8,000 · Civil RightsNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $6,000 · Civil RightsTHE FUND FOR IDAHO — $6,000 · Civil RightsRoot Social Justice Center Inc — $5,000 · Civil RightsTHE NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $20,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $12,000 · EnvironmentMontana Environmental Information Center — $10,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $10,000 · EnvironmentRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · EnvironmentSightline Institute — $8,000 · EnvironmentEAST MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COUNCIL INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES — $7,000 · EnvironmentPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC — $6,000 · EnvironmentEnvironmental Law Institute — $6,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $5,000 · Environment350 BAY AREA — $5,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $5,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF MERRYMEETING BAY — $5,000 · Environment+1 more — $4,000 · EnvironmentAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $19,000 · InternationalQUIXOTE CENTER INCORPORATED — $15,000 · InternationalCISPES EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $10,000 · InternationalPEOPLES RIGHTS FUND INC — $9,000 · InternationalPEACE ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $9,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE — $8,000 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $8,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $7,000 · InternationalVOICES ON THE BORDER INC — $7,000 · InternationalMADRE INC — $7,000 · InternationalAJ MUSTE FOUNDATION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE INC — $5,000 · InternationalGLOBAL HEALTH PARTNERS INC — $5,000 · InternationalSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $15,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $15,000 · Food & NutritionMOBILE MEALS OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCHEROKEE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS — $10,000 · Food & NutritionUNION COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS — $10,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionFEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES — $9,000 · Food & NutritionEAST BAY FOOD JUSTICE PROJECT — $8,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SPARTANBURG SOUP KITCHEN INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AND FISHES — $5,000 · Food & NutritionBAR HARBOR FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE PEOPLE'S FUND — $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesPENDLETON PLACE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesAL OTRO LADO — $9,000 · Human ServicesMake The Road States Inc — $8,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR FAIR FOOD — $6,000 · Human ServicesROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSEINC — $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Common Good Soup Kitchen Community — $5,000 · Human ServicesOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,161,000Philanthropy$136,000Civil Rights$127,000Environment$124,000International$119,000Food & Nutrition$117,000Human Services$106,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSpartanburg County Foundation — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE'S FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $23,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $19,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAPPALACHIAN COMMUNITY FUND — $18,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC — $18,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMake the Road New York — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUIXOTE CENTER INCORPORATED — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOST INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE TYGER COMMUNITY CENTER — $13,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJusticeAid — $13,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCIVIL RIGHTS CORPS — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAINE WOMENS FUND — $12,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMontana Environmental Information Center — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NOTAH BEGAY III FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHEROKEE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCISPES EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINOOK FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENDLETON PLACE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPICHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Gerrish H Milliken Fo…Tides FoundationCommon Counsel Founda…Marguerite Casey Foun…Wellspring Philanthro…ImpactassetsincProteus Fund IncThe Ford FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncNew Venture FundRsf Social Finance Inc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC67.1× affinity72 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 · Tides Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Impactassetsinc · Proteus Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Rsf Social Finance Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Peace and Justice Center — 41% of income from government
  • Beyond Toxics — 13% of income from government
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides — 5% of income from government
  • Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Seeding Justice — 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co?

Find your warmest path to The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 468 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines