Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

Beyond Pesticides

Beyond Pesticides (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 49 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,286,232 to it, the largest being FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ($1,200,000). 32 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.2M
Funders on record
49
Grants received
$4.3M
Net assets
$3.1M
32/49 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 47%
01What it does

What Beyond Pesticides does

Mission

Affect change through local action, assisting individuals and community-based organizations to stimulate discussions on the hazards of toxic pesticides, while providing information on safe alternatives.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community P&A: provided information on requests from the public & media for assistance for information on pesticides & available alternative methods.

    $635,186 spent$4,062 earned by the program
    56% of program spending
  2. Organic: educated on the organic model in local, state and federal programs that manage land and buildings and advance a green or sustainable economy that embraces the precautionary principle.

    $505,448 spent
    44% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,140,634.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2021 Revenue 122 ($2.1M) Expenses 107 ($1.4M) Net assets 129 ($3.1M)2022 Revenue 70 ($1.2M) Expenses 126 ($1.7M) Net assets 109 ($2.6M)2023 Revenue 121 ($2.1M) Expenses 85 ($1.1M) Net assets 151 ($3.6M)2024 Revenue 49 ($853k) Expenses 92 ($1.2M) Net assets 134 ($3.2M)2025 Revenue 66 ($1.2M) Expenses 93 ($1.2M) Net assets 132 ($3.1M)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (66)Expenses (93)Net assets (132)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $3.3M to $4.3M (+29%).

$3.1M
$3.9M
$3.3M
$4.3M
$3.9M
$3.8M
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 5% · 2025 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

92% of Beyond Pesticides’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$410k
’20
$701k
’21
−$460k
’22
$982k
’23
−$372k
’24
−$86k
’25
6.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jay Feldman

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed121212111110
Joined·+0+1+0+0+0
No longer listed·01101
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $428k → $520k.

14 of 49 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Beyond Pesticides’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 49 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Beyond Pesticides has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 28% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

42% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Beyond Pesticides.

28%
largest funder
56%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 94% · 2018 50% · 2019 54% · 2020 31% · 2021 27% · 2022 26% · 2023 38% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of Beyond Pesticides's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Beyond Pesticides draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 17 states in all.

ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
DE
NM
DC
HI
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 12 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Beyond Pesticides is better cushioned than half of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve6.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−8% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Beyond Pesticides

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 6%Fundraising 1%

Governance

8
board members
88%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

57%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 29 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
AL
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Beyond Pesticides: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Beyond Pesticides?
Beyond Pesticides (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 49 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,286,232 to it, the largest being FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ($1,200,000). 32 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Beyond Pesticides have?
IRS filings report 49 organizations giving $4,286,232 in grants to Beyond Pesticides, 32 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Beyond Pesticides?
FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS is the largest funder on record, with $1,200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Beyond Pesticides find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 49 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing