Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
93
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$6.2MEducation$4.6MHuman Services$3.5MFood & Nutrition$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.9MEmployment$745kCommunity Improvement$694kYouth Development$516kOther$0
02FY2025 · 93 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $130k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $683k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$19,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO FOUNDATION$250,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI INC$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO FOUNDATION$250,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$248,857
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$219,963
IOWA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION INC$200,000
HIGH SIERRA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC$150,000
BOSTON SENIOR HOME CARE INC$112,000
HOSPICE OF CENTRAL IOWA FOUNDATION$105,037
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO FOUNDATION$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION$100,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHERN NEVADA$100,000
ROYA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA F: $15k → 15%TEXAS PARENT-TO-PARENT: $90k → 10%VIOLAS HOUSE: $45k → 14%NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $15k → 19%ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC: $20k → 22%CASA DE PEREGRINOS INC: $33k → 23%COLLIER COUNTY HUNGER AND HOMELESS COALITION INC: $40k → 10%FEDERATION OF FAMILIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $15k → 13%KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $20k → 16%ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 8%TABITHAS WAY: $15k → 8%LIFETIME RESOURCES INC: $40k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE: $80k → 12%HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES OF ATTALA COUNTY INC: $50k → 23%MAGNOLIA ROSE COTTAGE INC: $40k → 8%HEBRON VA INC: $50k → 11%TEXAS GRANDPARENTS RAISING GRANDCHILDREN: $20k → 16%CASA DE PEREGRINOS INC: $20k → 23%FOSTER FORWARD: $25k → 14%FILL A HEART 4 KIDS INC: $50k → 8%CAPITAL CENTERS OF VIRGINIA: $50k → 22%APPLE PATCH COMMUNITY INC: $15k → 4%FILL A HEART 4 KIDS INC: $15k → 8%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER RICHMO: $20k → 22%HOSPICE OF CENTRAL IOWA FOUNDATION: $105k → 10%NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC: $20k → 11%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $50k → 14%REACH SERVICES INC: $30k → 12%FLYING HIGH INC: $100k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $25k → 13%OMAHA BETTER BIRTH PROJECT: $15k → 12%LIFE-HOUSTON INC: $15k → 16%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVIC: $100k → 21%CHILDRENS TRUST FUND OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $30k → 16%CHILDRENS TRUST FUND OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $30k → 16%SPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC: $40k → 14%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $25k → 13%FAMILY SERVICE OF RHODE ISLAND INC: $30k → 14%SPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC: $25k → 14%PROGRESSO LATINO: $50k → 14%SPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC: $20k → 14%RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 15%SPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC: $20k → 14%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC: $50k → 14%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 10%MILL COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 10%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $50k → 14%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SE: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.3M · 78 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

78 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
525

Total granted

$9.3M
$9.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+8%

Still filing today

81%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +13%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $921k · revenue +23%
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $475k · revenue ×45

Funded once

  • CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $550k · revenue +31%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI IN
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • FT
    FEEDING TEXASgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
2
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
3
Mhp Salud

We serve communities by embracing the strengths and experiences of individuals and families, engaging them to achieve health and well-being.

Health
4
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

5
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
6
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
7
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
8
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
9
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

10
Gallup Community Health

Gallup community health's mission is to provide excellent and accessible medical care to our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Family Health Centers

To promote the health of people in north central washington by providing access to health care to persons otherwise excluded from existing health care systems.

Health
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Stephen Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nuestra Gente Community Projects Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Senior Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Arts CentersEquine Therapy ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringYmca Youth DevelopmentChristian Youth CampsCommunity Food PantriesCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Affordable Housing Construc…School District FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyDevelopmental Disabilities …Lgbtq+ Community SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ServicesYouth Development CentersCommunity College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Local Food System Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Local History MuseumsAddiction Recovery ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%7/625
the rest of the field
13%
240,389/1,818,940

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

563 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 563 of the 670 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
83
Early backer (in before they grew)
551/563
Grantees still filing
317/563
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TORCH FOUNDATION — $350,000 · OtherIowa Primary Care Association Inc — $315,000 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY — $265,000 · OtherTHE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI IN — $250,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA — $219,963 · OtherFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC — $400,000 · OtherFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INCACUMEN FUND INC — $300,000 · Other+67 more — $3,989,923 · Other+67 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,200,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE U…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $921,171 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY …University of Nevada Reno Foundation — $701,000 · EducationUniversity of Nevada R…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $400,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGT…+12 more — $642,228 · Education+12 moreCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $550,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY …American Heart Association Inc — $405,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Asso…Reach Out — $245,000 · HealthReach OutHIGH SIERRA AHEC — $200,000 · HealthHIGH SIERRA AHECCALIFORNIA ACCESS COALITION — $200,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA ACCESS C…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $185,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE…THE MAVEN PROJECT — $150,000 · Health+29 more — $1,488,690 · Health+29 moreOperation Warm Inc — $321,996 · Human ServicesOperation War…Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada — $125,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Char…HOSPICE OF CENTRAL IOWA FOUNDATION — $115,037 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesFLYING HIGH INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $100,000 · Human ServicesARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $100,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS PARENT-TO-PARENT — $90,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $80,000 · Human Services+26 more — $1,125,000 · Human Services+26 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI — $550,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY F…VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $475,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER F…FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC — $185,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION …COMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $150,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY I…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · Philanthropy+10 more — $390,000 · Philanthropy+10 moreFARM SHARE INC — $180,000 · Food & NutritionMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC — $107,650 · Food & NutritionST MARTIN DE PORRES CENTER INC — $80,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC — $61,600 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $55,502 · Food & NutritionFOODCORPS INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $50,000 · Food & NutritionDARE TO CARE INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL FOODSHED — $30,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $75,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING TEXAS — $250,000 · Community ImprovementWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $140,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF PROVIDENCE COUNTY — $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE SPRINGFIELD PROJECT — $45,000 · Community ImprovementMAYFIELD GRAVES LTRG INC — $40,000 · Community ImprovementMAHI INTERNATIONAL — $35,000 · Community ImprovementAFTER THE PEANUT FOUNDATION NFP — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,564,886Education$3,864,399Health$3,423,690Human Services$2,262,033Philanthropy$1,920,000Food & Nutrition$819,752Community Improvement$585,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $921,171 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation — $701,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $550,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI — $550,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $475,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $405,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC — $400,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTORCH FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetOperation Warm Inc — $321,996 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetIowa Primary Care Association Inc — $315,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC — $300,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS — $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetReach Out — $245,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHIGH SIERRA AHEC — $200,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC — $185,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $185,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SHARE INC — $180,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc — $160,228 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJUSTICE IN AGING — $150,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT — $150,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $140,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL PEOPLE — $125,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada — $125,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIOWA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetHOSPICE OF CENTRAL IOWA FOUNDATION — $115,037 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBOSTON SENIOR HOME CARE INC — $112,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC — $107,650 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC — $105,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCOMPASS HEALTH — $102,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLYING HIGH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY LEADERSHIP CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetExcelsior Wellness — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBehavioral Health Association of Nevada — $90,142 over 1y, 62% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH CARE STRATEGIES INC — $88,502 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $85,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetST MARTIN DE PORRES CENTER INC — $80,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $80,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAVE — $77,228 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Multicare Health SystemWA40.9× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Multicare Health System · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Kroger Co Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Perigee Fund · NW Childrens Foundation · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · School's Out Washington · The Bamford Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Coastal Foodshed66% of income from government
  • Boston Senior Home Care Inc43% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc21% of income from government
  • Southwest Florida Regional Coalition to End Homelessness Inc14% of income from government
  • Center for Health Care Strategies Inc7% of income from government
  • Farm Share Inc6% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 670 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph