Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

PAVE

PAVE (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $612,728 to it, the largest being GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ($300,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$2.3M
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$613k
Net assets
$890k
2/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 20%
01What it does

What Pave does

Mission

PAVE provides support, training, information, and resources to empower and give voice to individuals, youth and families impacted by disabilities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Parent training and information (pti) center (funded through a grant from the us department of education since 1981) provides training, information, resources, and technical assistance to help parents, caregivers, youth, and professionals understand and advocate for individuals with disabilities birth through age 26 in washington state. Pti continues collaborative efforts with systems partners to address barriers, improve communications, and increase access to education and and related services.

    $650,124 spent
    38% of program spending
  2. Family to family health information center (f2fhic) (funded by the department of health and human services since 2005) helps families of children, youth, and young adults through age 25 with special health care needs (cyshcn), and the professionals who serve them, to find resources around care and support.

    $277,645 spent
    16% of program spending
  3. Lifespan respite wa (lrw) (funded by dshs) is a statewide program that offers support in the form of a voucher(financial award)for unpaid caregiverswho supporta family member, friend, or neighbor who has a special need or condition.

    $497,715 spent
    29% of program spending
  4. Pierce Count Parent to Parent (P2P) (Funded by Pierce County Human Services and the ARC of WA/State P2P) Provides support, training, information, and resources for individuals and families who experience intellectual and developmental disabilities across the lifespan for system navigation, P2P, outreach and education, and self-advocate leadership development and engagement.

    $257,648 spent
    15% of program spending
  5. Stomp (specialized training of military parents) program funded by the department of army) to provide virtual and in-seat (person) workshops on parents rights special education & healthcare services to military families and professionals at military installations in the u.s. And worldwide.

    $35,809 spent
    2% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,718,941.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.4M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($302k)2018 Revenue 90 ($1.3M) Expenses 91 ($1.3M) Net assets 102 ($308k)2019 Revenue 117 ($1.6M) Expenses 117 ($1.6M) Net assets 107 ($322k)2020 Revenue 94 ($1.3M) Expenses 105 ($1.4M) Net assets 64 ($194k)2021 Revenue 134 ($1.9M) Expenses 126 ($1.7M) Net assets 112 ($339k)2022 Revenue 111 ($1.6M) Expenses 124 ($1.7M) Net assets 68 ($205k)2023 Revenue 141 ($2.0M) Expenses 109 ($1.5M) Net assets 227 ($687k)2024 Revenue 143 ($2.0M) Expenses 147 ($2.0M) Net assets 220 ($666k)2025 Revenue 167 ($2.3M) Expenses 153 ($2.1M) Net assets 295 ($890k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (167)Expenses (153)Net assets (295)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $425k to $955k (+125%).

$394k
$378k
$439k
$300k
$589k
$425k
$955k
$826k
$982k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 89% · 2018 93% · 2019 96% · 2020 95% · 2021 95% · 2022 95% · 2023 83% · 2024 96% · 2025 82%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of PAVE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,352 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$24k
’17
$5k
’18
$15k
’19
−$129k
’20
$145k
’21
−$147k
’22
$479k
’23
−$20k
’24
$224k
’25
4.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Tracy Kahlo

Executive Director

Board chair

Mike Dolan

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed999999988
Joined·+0+2+0+3+3+0+1+0
No longer listed·02033020
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $7k → $395k.

4 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PAVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PAVE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 84%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

59% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PAVE.

49%
largest funder
84%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 75% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 76% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

20% of PAVE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 20% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

52% of PAVE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $292k that is directly attributable, 53% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 6 states.

WA
WI
MA
OR
NJ
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $321k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PAVE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 9,398 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · above the median
Months of reserve4.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,398 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding PAVE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $979k on record.

Federal$979k
grants $979kcontracts $0
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Education$600k
  • Department of Health and Human Services$379k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PAVE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PAVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PAVE?
PAVE (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $612,728 to it, the largest being GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ($300,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PAVE have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $612,728 in grants to PAVE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PAVE?
GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC is the largest funder on record, with $300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PAVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pave →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing