· Private foundation
Medina Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k60 grants · $159k
- $10k–50k151 grants · $3.9M
- $50k–250k8 grants · $400k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $250,000 |
| SOLID GROUND | $50,000 |
| AMARA | $50,000 |
| ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY | $50,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $50,000 |
| HOPELINK | $50,000 |
| FOOD LIFELINE | $50,000 |
| FARESTART | $50,000 |
| TREEHOUSE | $50,000 |
| BOYER CHILDREN'S CLINIC | $45,000 |
| HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES | $45,000 |
| VINE MAPLE PLACE | $45,000 |
| COCOON HOUSE | $45,000 |
| REFUGEE WOMEN'S ALLIANCE | $40,000 |
| SPEAK WITH PURPOSE | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
321 repeat relationships — 155 still active in FY2024, 166 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $753k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN3× · 2019–2021 · $501k · revenue +140%
- FLFOOD LIFELINE5× · 2017–2024 · $276k · revenue +89%
- TYTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871)7× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- MBMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -9%
- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON STATEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $68k · revenue +265%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.
Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Womens Christian Association of Seattle-King County-Snohomish County and the most unlike its peers is Mother Mentors of Whidbey Island. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
415 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 415 of the 510 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds AMARA ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds HOUSING HOPE ↗
- Who funds TACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT ↗
- Who funds GRAYS HARBOR YOUTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds Boyer Children's Clinic ↗
- Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds Bike Works Seattle ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds VISION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds VENTURES ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood House INC ↗
- Who funds SPEAK WITH PURPOSE ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THURSTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HopeSparks ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Team Read ↗
- Who funds King County Sexual Assault Resource Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SEASHARE ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · NW Childrens Foundation · School's Out Washington · Seattle Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · United Way of King County · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Medina Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Rural Development Initiatives Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Medina Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Medina Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.