· Private foundation
The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $151k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $422k
- $50k–250k31 grants · $4.6M
- $250k+44 grants · $143M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD | $50,000,000 |
| THE BROAD ART FOUNDATION | $27,000,000 |
| THE BROAD | $16,104,936 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $16,000,000 |
| THE BROAD | $6,000,000 |
| THE BROAD | $5,000,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES | $2,268,350 |
| GREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS NOW | $2,250,000 |
| EXPANDED LEARNING ALLIANCE EXPANDLA | $1,923,310 |
| VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM | $1,500,000 |
| LOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR | $1,010,000 |
| AMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC | $840,000 |
| REDF | $750,000 |
| THE BROAD | $685,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES | $683,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
174 repeat relationships — 72 still active in FY2024, 102 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBThe Broad Institute Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $511M · revenue +95%
- MPMADISON PROJECT5× · 2017–2021 · $8.7M · revenue +49% · 70% of their budget
- CICALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY6× · 2017–2022 · $5.2M · revenue +35%
Funded once
- YUYALE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $16M
- MOMuseum of Modern Artgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue +44%
- RLRESOURCES LEGACY FUNDone grant, 2021 · $2.5M · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Expanded Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Broad. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
351 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 351 of the 394 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BROAD ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BROAD ↗
- Who funds THE BROAD CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds GREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS NOW ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MADISON PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SILICON SCHOOLS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR ↗
- Who funds EXPANDED LEARNING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND ↗
- Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Green Dot Public Schools ↗
- Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES LEGACY FUND ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FUND ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CCF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FUND ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE SEED FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · The California Endowment · The James Irvine Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Verse Video Education — 35% of income from government
- The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.