· Private foundation
The Cowles Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k212 grants · $725k
- $10k–50k50 grants · $660k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRASP | $45,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS - BRIDGE INITIATIVE | $40,000 |
| WASSAIC PROJECT | $20,000 |
| DORA MAAR CULTURAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| WOMEN'S STUDIO WORKSHOP | $20,000 |
| GRANT FOUNDATION | $17,500 |
| VANGUARD SCHOOL | $17,500 |
| SISTER CITIES ESSEX HAITI INC | $15,000 |
| MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $15,000 |
| LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSAL SHAIVA FELLOWSHIP | $15,000 |
| STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM | $15,000 |
| ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $479k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
331 repeat relationships — 202 still active in FY2024, 129 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGRANT FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $168k · revenue +204%
- WSWomen's Studio Workshop Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +28%
- RAREACH AND TEACH MINISTRY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +130% · 60% of their budget
Funded once
- BIBRIDGE INITIATIVEone grant, 2020 · $20k
- BIBRIDGE INITIATIVEone grant, 2018 · $18k
- PFPhysicians For Reproductive Healthone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.
Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…
The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Audiences New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Iqair Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
395 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 395 of the 528 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Women's Studio Workshop Inc ↗
- Who funds REACH AND TEACH MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS MID-HUDSON INC ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds NU DECO ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE TIME INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEN-CHASE FOUNDATION DBA EAGLEBROOK SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FIGHTING CHANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GRASP INC ↗
- Who funds GENESIS HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SISTER CITIES ESSEX HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds The Multi-Cultural Health Institute ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds The Madeira School ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
- Who funds THE WASSAIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arison Arts Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Robert Lehman Foundation Inc · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Cowles Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc — 67% of income from government
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Friends of the Underline Inc — 66% of income from government
- Govans Ecumenical Development Corp — 28% of income from government
- Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — 23% of income from government
- Pines of Sarasota Inc — 18% of income from government
- Community Action Stops Abuse Inc — 13% of income from government
- The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Brookwood Florida Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Camillus House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Vermont Studio Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Nu Deco Ensemble Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc — 0% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Cushman School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cowles Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Cowles Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.