· Private foundation
Robert Lehman Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $417k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $1,042,500 |
| PORTLAND ART MUSEUM | $100,000 |
| THE MORGAN LIBRARY & MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| BROOKS SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART | $35,000 |
| THE BROOKLYN MUSEUM | $33,000 |
| PARRISH ART MUSEUM | $31,000 |
| NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL OF DRAWING PAINTING & SCULPTURE | $30,000 |
| NXTHVN INC | $27,500 |
| THE JEWISH MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| THE BARNES FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| STERLING & FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| DETROIT INSTITUE OF ARTS | $20,000 |
| BRONX MUSEUM OF THE ARTS | $15,000 |
| PUBLICOLOR INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART4× · 2021–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +69%
PORTLAND ART MUSEUM3× · 2021–2024 · $195k · revenue +40%- TBTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES4× · 2020–2024 · $133k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTone grant, 2020 · $811k
- SISMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTone grant, 2020 · $50k
- CMCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ARTone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…
The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.
The newport art museum's mission is to share a diversity of art and experiences that spark reflection, inspiration, and connection within our newport community and beyond. the museum was founded in 1912 on the belief that arts and culture…
Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)
The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Folk Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Archives for Research in Archetypal Symbolisminc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 167 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds STERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds THE WILLIAM A FARNSWORTH LIBRARY AND ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMER INC ↗
- Who funds THE DRAWING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLICOLOR INC ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds ART21 INC ↗
- Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE HYDE COLLECTION TRUST ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds The Bronx Museum of the Arts ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cowles Charitable Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Ag Foundation · Terra Foundation for American Art · Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · Arison Arts Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Wolf Kahn Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert Lehman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- The Montclair Art Museum — 11% of income from government
- The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Camp 45 Contemporary Converge 45 — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- New Britain Museum of American Art Inc — 7% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Center for Contemporary Art Inc — 4% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Eastern Oregon Regional Arts Council dba Art Center East — 3% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Nxthvn Inc — 1% of income from government
- The College of New Jersey Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert Lehman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robert Lehman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.