· Private foundation
Panwy Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k164 grants · $152k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HMS 1974 MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $100,000 |
| OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL CHURCH | $100,000 |
| AVON THEATRE FILM CENTRE INC | $60,000 |
| KIDS IN CRISIS | $13,000 |
| COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AT MIT | $10,250 |
| STRATTON FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| MSPCA-ANGELL | $7,500 |
| NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR | $5,750 |
| SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| BERGEN FAMILY CENTER | $5,000 |
| CARCINOID CANCER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ONE EQUAL HEART FOUNDATION | $4,350 |
| YWCA GREENWICH | $4,100 |
| MIT ANNUAL FUND | $4,000 |
| THE ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
233 repeat relationships — 153 still active in FY2024, 80 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KIKIDS IN CRISIS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +76%
- GCGrace Cottage Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +115%
- FRFLAT ROCK BROOK NATURE ASSOCIATION INC7× · 2017–2023 · $67k · revenue +196%
Funded once
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH OF LACONIA NEW HAMPSHIREone grant, 2021 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $7k
- KCKIDS CLOTHES CLUB INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverdale Neighborhood House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cair-Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
216 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 216 of the 356 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds Grace Cottage Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLAT ROCK BROOK NATURE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AVON THEATRE FILM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CARCINOID CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BORDER YOUTH TENNIS EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY CHEST OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
- Who funds One Equal Heart Foundation ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH ADULT DAY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Resource Foundation Inc · The William J and Frances E Deutsch Charitable Foundation · Malkin Fund Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · The per and Astrid Heidenreich Family Foundation · Simmons Family Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Dr Joseph J Lawrence Trust Diana Serrell Trustee · The Gibbons Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Panwy Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sisters at the Shore — 84% of income from government
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Native Fish Society Inc — 27% of income from government
- Bergen Family Center — 25% of income from government
- Liberation Programs Inc — 24% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- The Carver Inc — 16% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- 2LIFE Communities Inc — 8% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc — 3% of income from government
- Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
- Westport Country Playhouse Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Greenwich Arts Council Inc — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Greenwich Symphony Orchestra Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Coolidge Corner Theatre Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.