· Private foundation
Simmons Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EAGLES AUTISM FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| REACH PREP INC | $35,000 |
| PURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC | $35,000 |
| THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE | $30,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC | $20,000 |
| BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| SOCIETY OF FOUR ARTS | $10,000 |
| GREENWICH COUNTRY CAY SCHOOL INC | $10,000 |
| PERSON-TO-PERSON INC | $8,950 |
| CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC | $5,195 |
| THE STAMFORD HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| EMO AND CIV HELP THE WORLD CORP | $5,000 |
| MV YOUTH INC | $5,000 |
| BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC | $3,000 |
| MARTHAS VINEYARD SAFETY ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE7× · 2019–2025 · $245k · revenue +127%
- RPREACH PREP INC9× · 2017–2025 · $192k · revenue +67%
- EAEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $84k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- TPTHE PLANETARY SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +19%
THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -15%- BMBRUCE MUSEUM INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds REACH PREP INC ↗
- Who funds EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds MV YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds PURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds YOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds The Stamford Hospital ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds THE PLANETARY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds BRUCE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds READYCT INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Norwich University ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds STEW LEONARD III WATER SAFETY FD INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Rich Foundation Inc · Malkin Fund Inc · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Stamford Rotary Trust Fund · Panwy Foundation Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Newman's Own Foundation · The Stanton Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Simmons Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mill River Collaborative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Readyct Inc — 61% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Governor's Partnership to Protect Connecticut's Workforce Inc — 44% of income from government
- Women's Business Development Council Inc — 39% of income from government
- Children's Learning Centers of Fairfield County Inc — 36% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc — 34% of income from government
- Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Hill House Inc — 28% of income from government
- Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc — 17% of income from government
- Stamford Senior Centerinc — 16% of income from government
- Project Music Inc — 14% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
- Norwich University — 4% of income from government
- Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- Silvermine Guild of Artists Inc — 1% of income from government
- Health in the Hood Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of Mvyradio Inc — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Stamford Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Simmons Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Simmons Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.