Wyoming · Nonprofit
WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION
WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (Wyoming) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $351,729 to it, the largest being Shikar-Safari Club International ($100,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $432k
- Funders on record
- 14
- Grants received
- $352k
- Net assets
- $1.3M
What Water for Wildlife Foundation does
Mission
Preserve history and conserve land and water resources
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Help preserve history of the lander one shot antelope hunt
$5,035 spent3% of program spendingDevelop water resources for wildlife, wildlife habitat and to work with other land users to conserve water.
$139,397 spentof which $1,292 as grants97% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $144,432.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $1.1M to $1.3M (+25%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
77% of WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (1% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $11k → $36k.
7 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 28% of grant income and the top three 65%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 91% · 2018 65% · 2019 31% · 2020 63% · 2021 73% · 2022 48% · 2023 63% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
44% of WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION draws 87% of its grant income from funders outside Wyoming, across 7 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $175k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,185 membership benefit nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,185 membership benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Wyoming
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
76% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
72%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION?
- WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (Wyoming) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $351,729 to it, the largest being Shikar-Safari Club International ($100,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION have?
- IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $351,729 in grants to WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION?
- Shikar-Safari Club International is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WATER FOR WILDLIFE FOUNDATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wyoming. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Water for Wildlife →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing