Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC

YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC (Washington) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,027,266 to it, the largest being GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH ($2,072,980). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$396M
Funders on record
29
Grants received
$8.0M
Net assets
$225M
12/29 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic does

Mission

The mission of yvfwc is to improve lives and strengthen the health of the communities we serve by providing quality and accessible health care to all regardless of ability to pay.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Yvfwc delivers comprehensive, accessible primary care through its core medical, dental, and pharmacy service lines, supported by case management, wic services, patient education, and clinical pharmacist medication management. Eligible services are offered on a sliding fee scale. During the reporting year, providing 610,885 medical and case management encounters, 174,617 dental encounters, and dispensed 1,047,226 prescriptions.

    $302,534,228 spentof which $18,988,189 as grants$326,684,886 earned by the program
    94% of program spending
  2. Mental health counseling and chemical dependency counseling. Mental health and chemical dependency encounters during the year were 39,608.

    $11,271,223 spent$15,529,109 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  3. Low income energy assistance, home weatherization, and education and counseling services. During the year there were 7,514 individuals served.

    $8,117,637 spentof which $2,952,119 as grants$23,466 earned by the program
    3% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $321,923,088.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($188M) Expenses 100 ($185M) Net assets 100 ($120M)2018 Revenue 107 ($202M) Expenses 108 ($199M) Net assets 102 ($122M)2019 Revenue 118 ($223M) Expenses 116 ($214M) Net assets 110 ($132M)2020 Revenue 125 ($235M) Expenses 126 ($233M) Net assets 112 ($135M)2021 Revenue 140 ($264M) Expenses 140 ($258M) Net assets 118 ($141M)2022 Revenue 161 ($302M) Expenses 136 ($252M) Net assets 157 ($188M)2023 Revenue 186 ($349M) Expenses 175 ($322M) Net assets 178 ($214M)2024 Revenue 186 ($350M) Expenses 187 ($346M) Net assets 182 ($219M)2025 Revenue 211 ($396M) Expenses 213 ($393M) Net assets 187 ($225M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (211)Expenses (213)Net assets (187)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $273M to $334M (+22%).

$200M
$201M
$216M
$208M
$232M
$273M
$334M
$344M
$336M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 22% · 2018 20% · 2019 18% · 2020 15% · 2021 18% · 2022 17% · 2023 16% · 2024 13% · 2025 11%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

12% of YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (1% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,211 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$3.5M
’17
$3.2M
’18
$9.0M
’19
$2.2M
’20
$6.5M
’21
$50M
’22
$27M
’23
$3.5M
’24
$3.6M
’25
1.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Christine Trotter

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Adrian Ochoa

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed222122232323262520
Joined·+6+5+4+5+4+7+6+3
No longer listed·74354478
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $540k → $300k.

6 of 29 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.6M from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Agena). These are real filings, and they are not money YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC raised.

From the IRS filings of YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 28 of 29 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 26% of grant income and the top three 60%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC.

26%
largest funder
60%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 88% · 2018 100% · 2019 53% · 2020 58% · 2021 29% · 2022 32% · 2023 33% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 41% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

66% of YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
OR
CA
MO
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $850k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC is better cushioned than half of the 1,241 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve1.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,241 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2025

Government funding YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $279.4M on record — $265.6M federal, $13.9M state.

Federal$265.6M
grants $265.6Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$264.5M
  • Department of Labor$1.1M
State$13.9M
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top programs
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$13.3M
  • PAYMENTS TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS$317k
  • MEDICAL SERVICES$119k
  • OTHER SPEC PAYMENTS-MEDICIAL SERVICES$111k
  • AGENCY PROGRAM RELATED SERVICES$30k
  • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NON-IT$4k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 18%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Part of a family of 4 related entities

  • Agena · exempt
  • Yvfwc Healthcare Facilities Development · exempt
  • Yvfwc Healthcare Facilities Development II · exempt
  • Childrens Village · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC?
YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC (Washington) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,027,266 to it, the largest being GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH ($2,072,980). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC have?
IRS filings report 29 organizations giving $8,027,266 in grants to YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC?
GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH is the largest funder on record, with $2,072,980 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 29 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing