· Private foundation
Hemingway Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 97 grants below total $940,371 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,203,371 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $263,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k54 grants · $229k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $711k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Neighborhood House Association | $45,000 |
| University of Utah | $41,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Salt Lake | $40,500 |
| The Children's Center | $30,000 |
| The Nature Conservancy in Idaho | $25,000 |
| Environmental Resource Center (ERC) | $25,000 |
| Young Women's Christian Association of Utah (dba YWCA Utah) | $25,000 |
| Red Butte Garden at University of Utah | $23,996 |
| Jewish Family Service | $20,000 |
| Encircle Family & Youth Resource Center | $20,000 |
| Salt Lake Valley Habitat for Humanity | $20,000 |
| Utah Symphony-Utah Opera | $20,000 |
| Women of the World | $20,000 |
| Higher Ground Sun Valley, Inc. | $20,000 |
| Volunteers of America, Utah | $20,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNeighborhood House Association2× · 2021–2022 · $135k · revenue +20%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE2× · 2021–2022 · $61k · revenue +14%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH2× · 2021–2022 · $55k · revenue +92%
Funded once
- ISINTERMOUNTAIN SPECIALIZED ABUSE TREATMENT CENTER DBAISAT CENTERone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -60%
- DPDAVIS PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION DBA CENTERPOINT LEGACY THEATREone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +21%
- BCBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
The mission of salt lake community action is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and build communities through education and self-sufficiency programs.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
To foster the arts in all forms in order to create an aware, empowered, and connected community.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.
To provide alternative environmentally responsible transportation to downtown travelers through a bike share program.
USARA's mission is to connect and inspire communities to advocate for addiction recovery. We envision a Utah where recovery community and connection are recognized as the most valuable assets for people to recover from addiction.
We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Support Center and the most unlike its peers is Rotarun Ski Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Service ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC ↗
- Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE CENTER OF CACHE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Women of the World ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SALT LAKE AREA ↗
- Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FUTURES ↗
- Who funds The Community Library Association Inc ↗
- Who funds English Skills Learning Center ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY - ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds LAUGHING STOCK THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF ADDICTION RECOVERY (SOAR) INC ↗
- Who funds Sageland Collaborative ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN ↗
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah ↗
- Who funds THE SALT LAKE FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE ↗
- Who funds FARWISE INC ↗
- Who funds Utah Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · McCarthey Family Foundation · Utah's Promise
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hemingway Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hemingway Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.