· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico
The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 55 grants below total $3,143,797 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,733,083 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,589,286 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $405k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+5 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| New Mexico State University F | $481,840 |
| Mesilla Valley Economic Dev A | $325,000 |
| NM Association for Infant Men | $308,000 |
| Jardin de los Ninos | $258,973 |
| Borderplex Bi-National Econ A | $250,000 |
| University of Chicago | $220,000 |
| Franklin Mountain Packaging | $150,000 |
| Community Action Agency SNM | $110,500 |
| 100 Chaves County LLC | $95,000 |
| Dona Ana Community College | $89,013 |
| 3 Suns Birth | $82,500 |
| Monti Inc | $75,000 |
| Ivy Child International Inc | $58,592 |
| Casa de Peregrinos | $51,545 |
| Seco Spice LTD Co | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +123%
- MVMESILLA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +74% · 29% of their budget
- BBBORDERPLEX BI-NATIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE4× · 2021–2024 · $735k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- NMNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $880k
- TWTrust Waste LLCone grant, 2023 · $140k
- ECElectronic Caregiverone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…
Casa de salud provides health care services to low-income, indigent and underserved populations in new mexico. primary care, counseling, acupuncture, massage, reiki, addictions treatment, syringe exchange, medical debt management, case…
New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.
As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…
New mexico ethics watch is dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life.
La cosecha's mission is to ensure equitable access to healthy food, provide nutrition education, and foster growth and investment in community-driven markets. these efforts aim to support the development of a just, sustainable, and…
To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.
Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Broken Promises Sw. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
- Who funds MESILLA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BORDERPLEX BI-NATIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico ↗
- Who funds CASA DE PEREGRINOS ↗
- Who funds JARDIN DE LOS NINOS INC ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Association for Infant Mental Health ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds NM Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe ↗
- Who funds HAGERMANFORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds IVY CHILD INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S READING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MESILLA VALLEY CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds VASHON-MAURY ISLAND HERITAGE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION FOR DENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NGAGE NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC ↗
- Who funds 100 PERCENT OTERO ↗
- Who funds MESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLAY SHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · The Stocker Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Lineberry Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Enchanted Life Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.