· Private foundation
Mb and Edna Zale Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k95 grants · $214k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $949k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $304k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER DALLAS | $200,000 |
| HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC | $54,000 |
| FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER DALLAS | $45,000 |
| HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JIR | $36,000 |
| FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC | $36,000 |
| UVALDE CISD MOVING FORWARD FOUNDATION | $36,000 |
| DALLAS HOLOCAUST AND HUMAN RIGHTS MUSEUM | $35,000 |
| TEMPLE EMANU-EL | $30,000 |
| GOLDRINGWOLDENBERG INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE | $30,000 |
| DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| BBYO | $25,000 |
| DALLAS SPARK | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS | $25,000 |
| CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB (CPAL) | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
199 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 136 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +263%
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $411k · revenue +72%
- DFDALLAS FURNITURE BANK8× · 2017–2024 · $385k · revenue +174% · 28% of their budget
Funded once
- BBB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGone grant, 2022 · $61k
- GWGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTERone grant, 2023 · $36k
- TBTexas Business Hall of Fame Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $34k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…
Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Abide Womens Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
266 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 266 of the 342 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds DALLAS FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds THE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC ↗
- Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Dallas SPARK ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds Undies for Everyone ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds SWIPE OUT HUNGER ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE ↗
- Who funds TEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds DOROT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLAH FOR HUNGER ↗
- Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COMPASS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Addy Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · The Moody Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mb and Edna Zale Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
- Oregon Community Warehouse Inc — 24% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Join — 4% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
- Gateway Community Outreach Inc — 0% of income from government
- Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mb and Edna Zale Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Mb and Edna Zale Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.