Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$491k
Granted FY2024still arriving
101
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$673kHealth$480kArts & Culture$391kReligion$245kEnvironment$235kInternational$233kFood & Nutrition$170kCrime & Legal$154kOther$0
02FY2024 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k84 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $378k
$1,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COUNTRY SCHOOL$41,490
CHAPEL OF ST JAMES THE FISHERMAN$34,165
DEMOCRATISM INC$22,850
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$21,000
PORTLAND TRAILS$20,000
BOULDER BALLET$20,000
WILLS PARK EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION$20,000
OUR HOUSE$20,000
THE FLORENCE PROJECT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST$20,000
CAF AMERICA$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE SAFINA CENTER$20,000
BLUE SKY BRIDGE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $329k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AL OTRO LADO: $2k → 11%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $30k → 8%HOUSE OF HOPE REFUGE OF LOVE INC: $20k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $2k → 11%HOUR CHILDREN: $1k → 13%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $20k → 8%HOUSE OF HOPE REFUGE OF LOVE INC: $20k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $1k → 11%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20k → 14%BOULDER JCC: $29k → 12%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $800 → 14%BOULDER JCC: $21k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $12k → 12%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $1k → 14%BOULDER JCC: $6k → 12%EMMA'S TORCH: $20k → 20%BOULDER JCC: $2k → 12%ELDER SERVICES OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY: $600 → 12%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $20k → 12%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $20k → 12%ELDER SERVICES OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY: $500 → 12%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $4k → 12%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $800 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%THE BARKER FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%YOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $2k → 14%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%WORLD HARVEST CHARITIES: $1k → 14%JUBILEE CONSORTIUM: $50k → 14%JUBILEE CONSORTIUM: $500 → 14%CITY GATE: $1k → 14%CITY GATE: $1k → 14%CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CHARITY WATER: $2k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $4k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 153 repeat orgs$624k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

153 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

153
136

Total granted

$2.5M
$512k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+14%

Still filing today

70%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MEHER FUND INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +148%
  • TB
    THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2019–2023 · $70k · revenue +47%
  • CJ
    COLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $69k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTH CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR WELL-BEING
    one grant, 2022 · $31k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -92%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $23k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Fair Wage Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Cameron and Hayden Lord Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEquine Therapy ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsDance Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community Organizati…Christian Youth CampsLgbtq+ Community SupportLocal History MuseumsAddiction Recovery ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesCommunity Food PantriesCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Social Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/233
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,332

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

223 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 223 of the 314 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
221/223
Grantees still filing
150/223
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $214,584 · OtherTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCMEHER FUND INC — $150,000 · OtherMEHER FUND INCDEMOCRATISM — $70,600 · Other+116 more — $1,367,838 · Other+116 moreTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $69,500 · Human ServicesTHE BOULDER …Jubilee Consortium — $50,500 · Human ServicesJubilee Cons…LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesLIVING & LEA…ACCESS OPPORTUNITY — $40,000 · Human ServicesACCESS OPPOR…HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc — $40,000 · Human ServicesHouseofHopeR…THE PEOPLE CONCERN — $20,800 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE C…EMMA'S TORCH LTD — $20,000 · Human ServicesEMMA'S TORCH…+10 more — $38,454 · Human Services+10 moreWOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES — $63,900 · EducationWOODFORDS…Charter Foundation — $44,000 · EducationCharter F…Elon University — $40,000 · EducationElon Univ…ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $26,422 · EducationST LAWREN…THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationTHE SEVEN…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $15,750 · EducationUNIVERSIT…+11 more — $42,000 · Education+11 morePOETS HOUSE INC — $43,250 · Arts & CultureFOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP — $29,200 · Arts & CultureBOULDER BALLET — $21,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA COLORADO — $19,622 · Arts & CultureJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $16,750 · Arts & Culture+16 more — $48,736 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $53,133 · InternationalAmurtel Inc — $50,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $27,126 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC — $27,000 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $9,826 · International+6 more — $21,844 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $64,600 · HealthMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $41,622 · HealthBACKLINE CARE INC — $23,030 · HealthALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM — $20,400 · Health+5 more — $12,500 · HealthCOLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE — $69,100 · Crime & LegalFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $52,800 · Crime & LegalCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $20,000 · Crime & LegalINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION — $5,200 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $1,622 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,803,022Human Services$329,254Education$252,072Arts & Culture$198,558International$188,929Health$162,152Crime & Legal$148,722

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $214,584 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMEHER FUND INC — $150,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $69,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE — $69,100 over 6y, 11% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $64,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES — $63,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $53,133 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $52,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJubilee Consortium — $50,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAmurtel Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetEDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC — $44,622 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCharter Foundation — $44,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $43,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOETS HOUSE INC — $43,250 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $41,622 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetACCESS OPPORTUNITY — $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBig Green — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetElon University — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc — $40,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetGreenWood — $37,200 over 6y, 18% of budgetBERKSHIRE GARDEN CENTER INC DBA BERKSHIRE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $35,600 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP — $29,200 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $27,126 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC — $27,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $26,422 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND NUCLEAR — $26,400 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $26,322 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $24,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND TRAILS — $24,200 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE NEW YORK FESTIVAL OF SONG INC — $23,600 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetBACKLINE CARE INC — $23,030 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetWILLS PARK EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC — $21,822 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBOULDER BALLET — $21,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE — $21,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $20,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM — $20,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $20,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENAGERS INC — $20,150 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBRIGHT HORIZONS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MEHER FUND INC
  • Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds COLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME
  • Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Jubilee Consortium
  • Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER
  • Who funds Amurtel Inc
  • Who funds EDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC
  • Who funds Charter Foundation
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds POETS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds MILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY
  • Who funds Big Green
  • Who funds Elon University
  • Who funds HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc
  • Who funds GreenWood
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE GARDEN CENTER INC DBA BERKSHIRE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING
  • Who funds FOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BEYOND NUCLEAR
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds PORTLAND TRAILS
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK FESTIVAL OF SONG INC
  • Who funds BACKLINE CARE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louise Taft Semple FoundationOH23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Denver Foundation · The Buchwald Family Foundation · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Kennebec Savings Bank Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Onion Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 160%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Outer Cape Health Services Inc18% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc10% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc7% of income from government
  • Interfaith Works4% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc3% of income from government
  • Sheffield Historical Society2% of income from government
  • Edith Wharton Restoration Inc1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc0% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 314 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph