· Private foundation
Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k84 grants · $113k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $378k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE COUNTRY SCHOOL | $41,490 |
| CHAPEL OF ST JAMES THE FISHERMAN | $34,165 |
| DEMOCRATISM INC | $22,850 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $21,000 |
| PORTLAND TRAILS | $20,000 |
| BOULDER BALLET | $20,000 |
| WILLS PARK EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| OUR HOUSE | $20,000 |
| THE FLORENCE PROJECT | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST | $20,000 |
| CAF AMERICA | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| THE SAFINA CENTER | $20,000 |
| BLUE SKY BRIDGE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $329k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
153 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMEHER FUND INC7× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +148%
- TBTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER5× · 2019–2023 · $70k · revenue +47%
- CJCOLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE6× · 2018–2024 · $69k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- NCNORTH CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR WELL-BEINGone grant, 2022 · $31k
- NMNEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDINGone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -92%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Fair Wage Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Cameron and Hayden Lord Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
223 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 223 of the 314 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MEHER FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Jubilee Consortium ↗
- Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Amurtel Inc ↗
- Who funds EDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC ↗
- Who funds Charter Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds POETS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds Big Green ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc ↗
- Who funds GreenWood ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE GARDEN CENTER INC DBA BERKSHIRE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC ↗
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BEYOND NUCLEAR ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND TRAILS ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK FESTIVAL OF SONG INC ↗
- Who funds BACKLINE CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Denver Foundation · The Buchwald Family Foundation · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Kennebec Savings Bank Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Onion Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Outer Cape Health Services Inc — 18% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Inn at Nih Inc — 10% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
- Interfaith Works — 4% of income from government
- Native Plant Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sheffield Historical Society — 2% of income from government
- Edith Wharton Restoration Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.