· Private foundation
The Buchwald Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $116k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $176k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $200,000 |
| BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL | $30,000 |
| NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP | $20,050 |
| BERKSHIRE BOUNTY | $20,000 |
| CITY MEALS-ON-WHEELS | $16,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT | $14,130 |
| BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,600 |
| CEDARS SINAI | $10,000 |
| MISSION MSA | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| THE PEOPLE'S PANTRY | $10,000 |
| BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $7,500 |
| GREAT BARRINGTON PUBLIC THEATRE | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
80 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $897k · revenue +219%
MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $707k · revenue +186%- CCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- NMNATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN HISTORYone grant, 2021 · $25k
- IAIndian American Impact Projectone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -94%
- TCTHE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +359%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Producing and developing plays and musicals.
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
Seeks to expand the boundaries of theater, producing, performing and presenting works of literary, experimental and educational value. provide a home for outstanding artists, a training ground for young artists (including an extensive…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
See schedule o for organization's mission statementmission statement: the huntington theatre company engages, inspires, entertains and challenges audiences with theatrical productions that range from the classics to new works; we train and…
The new group is an artist-driven company with a commitment to developing and producing powerful, contemporary theater. while constantly evolving, we maintain an ensemble approach to all our work and an articulated style of emotional…
Central square theater, the oldest female-led theater organization in greater boston, is an innovator in the non-profit arts field in collaborative leadership. cst engages over 35,000 people annually through live performance, rigorous…
Please see schedule o for the complete mission statement.berkeley repertory theatre creates ambitious theatre that entertains and challenges its audiences, provokes civic engagement, and inspires people to experience the world in new and…
The barrow group is an award-winning theatre company and training center located in the heart of new york city. our mission is to combine spontaneous acting with well-crafted stories that address social, spiritual and political issues, and…
To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America and the most unlike its peers is Ally Bedford Childrens Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds WAM THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLES PANTRY ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds WAMC ↗
- Who funds THE DEBATE SOCIETY LTD ↗
- Who funds FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREAT BARRINGTON PUBLIC THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE OPERA FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds EDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Dr Robert C & Tina Sohn Foundation · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · The Jane & Martin Schwartz Family Foundation · Shoval Foundation · Berkshire United Way Inc · The Velmans Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Janey Fund Charitable Trust · Claudia K Perles Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Buchwald Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Railroad Street Youth Project Inc — 45% of income from government
- Berkshire Grown Inc — 28% of income from government
- Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc — 18% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
- Wam Theatre Inc — 4% of income from government
- Construct Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairview Hospital — 3% of income from government
- Community Access to the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Chester Theatre Company Inc — 2% of income from government
- Egremont Land Trust Inc — 2% of income from government
- Edith Wharton Restoration Inc — 1% of income from government
- Shakespeare & Company Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.