Skip to content
Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$480k
Granted FY2025still arriving
107
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$673kHealth$480kArts & Culture$391kReligion$245kEnvironment$235kInternational$233kFood & Nutrition$170kCrime & Legal$154kOther$0
02FY2025 · 107 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k89 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $360k
$1,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REFORMED CHURCH NURSERY SCHOOL$22,800
PARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATION$22,000
LANAI CAT SANCTUARY$20,800
AMURTEL INC$20,000
WELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY$20,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$20,000
PASADENA HUMANE$20,000
NORTH BAY ORGANIZING PROJECT$20,000
TRIVIUM LIFE SERVICES$20,000
BOULDER JCC$20,000
BREASTFEEDING FAMILY FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES$20,000
THE MOUNT$20,000
NO KILL GLYNN COUNTY$20,000
EAGLE HILL SCHOOL FOUNDATION$20,000
GREATFUL CATSCANINES ALLIES & SUPPORTERS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AL OTRO LADO: $2k → 11%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $30k → 8%HOUSE OF HOPE REFUGE OF LOVE INC: $20k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $2k → 11%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $20k → 8%HOUSE OF HOPE REFUGE OF LOVE INC: $20k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $1k → 11%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20k → 14%HOUR CHILDREN: $1k → 13%BOULDER JCC: $29k → 12%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $800 → 14%BOULDER JCC: $21k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $20k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $12k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $6k → 12%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $1k → 14%EMMA'S TORCH: $20k → 20%BOULDER JCC: $2k → 12%ELDER SERVICES OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY: $600 → 12%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%ELDER SERVICES OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY: $500 → 12%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $20k → 12%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $1k → 14%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $4k → 12%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $20k → 12%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $800 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $400 → 17%YOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $2k → 14%WORLD HARVEST CHARITIES: $1k → 14%JUBILEE CONSORTIUM: $50k → 14%JUBILEE CONSORTIUM: $500 → 14%CITY GATE: $1k → 14%CITY GATE: $1k → 14%CITY GATE: $1k → 14%CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CITY GATE: $800 → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $4k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $2k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 165 repeat orgs$828k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

165 repeat relationships: 75 still active in FY2025, 90 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

165
142

Total granted

$2.8M
$580k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+14%

Still filing today

70%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MEHER FUND INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $166k · revenue +148%
  • TB
    THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +47%
  • AI
    Amurtel Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTH CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR WELL-BEING
    one grant, 2022 · $31k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -92%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for the City of New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Cameron and Hayden Lord Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

239 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 239 of the 344 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
50
Early backer (in before they grew)
237/239
Grantees still filing
156/239
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $214,584 · OtherTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCMEHER FUND INC: $166,000 · OtherMEHER FUND INCDEMOCRATISM: $72,800 · Other+120 more: $1,664,472 · Other+120 moreTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $89,500 · Human ServicesTHE BOULDER…Jubilee Consortium: $50,500 · Human ServicesJubilee Con…LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesLIVING & LE…HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc: $40,000 · Human ServicesHouseofHope…ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $40,000 · Human ServicesACCESS OPPO…THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20,800 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE …EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $20,000 · Human ServicesEMMA'S TORC…+9 more: $41,732 · Human Services+9 moreWOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES: $63,900 · EducationCharter Foundation: $44,000 · EducationElon University: $40,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $26,422 · EducationWELLFLEET FOOD PANTRY: $20,000 · EducationTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $15,750 · Education+11 more: $46,700 · EducationPOETS HOUSE INC: $45,250 · Arts & CultureFOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP: $29,200 · Arts & CultureBOULDER BALLET: $21,000 · Arts & CultureJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $20,250 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA COLORADO: $19,622 · Arts & Culture+14 more: $51,242 · Arts & CultureAmurtel Inc: $70,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $53,133 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,126 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC: $27,000 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $11,626 · InternationalBRIDGING INSIGHTS INC: $10,000 · International+4 more: $15,222 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $64,600 · HealthMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $41,622 · HealthBACKLINE CARE INC: $23,030 · HealthBREASTFEEDING FAMILY FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES: $22,000 · HealthALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM: $20,400 · Health+3 more: $9,500 · HealthCOLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE: $69,100 · Crime & LegalFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $52,800 · Crime & LegalCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $22,400 · Crime & LegalINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION: $6,200 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,117,856Human Services$352,532Education$276,772Arts & Culture$226,564International$217,107Health$181,152Crime & Legal$150,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $214,584 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMEHER FUND INC: $166,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $89,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAmurtel Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetCOLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE: $69,100 over 6y, 11% of budgetEDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC: $64,622 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $64,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES: $63,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $53,133 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $52,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJubilee Consortium: $50,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOETS HOUSE INC: $45,250 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetCharter Foundation: $44,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $41,622 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetElon University: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Green: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc: $40,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATION: $39,422 over 7y, 12% of budgetGreenWood: $37,200 over 6y, 18% of budgetBERKSHIRE GARDEN CENTER INC DBA BERKSHIRE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $35,900 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,126 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP: $29,200 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBEYOND NUCLEAR: $27,400 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $27,122 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC: $27,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $26,422 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $24,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND TRAILS: $24,200 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE NEW YORK FESTIVAL OF SONG INC: $23,600 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetBACKLINE CARE INC: $23,030 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTRIVIUM LIFE SERVICES: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $22,400 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBREASTFEEDING FAMILY FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES: $22,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetWILLS PARK EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $21,822 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $21,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetBOULDER BALLET: $21,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLANAI CAT SANCTUARY: $20,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $20,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM: $20,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $20,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENAGERS INC: $20,150 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEHER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Amurtel Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO JUDICIAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODFORDS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Jubilee Consortium ↗
  • Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds POETS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Charter Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Elon University ↗
  • Who funds Big Green ↗
  • Who funds HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds PARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GreenWood ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE GARDEN CENTER INC DBA BERKSHIRE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL CREATIVE ARTS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND NUCLEAR ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAINE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND TRAILS ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK FESTIVAL OF SONG INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKLINE CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louise Taft Semple Fo…Berkshire Taconic Com…Community Foundation …The Greater Cincinnat…The New York Communit…The Denver FoundationThe Buchwald Family F…The Feigenbaum Founda…Kennebec Savings Bank…Colorado Gives Founda…Onion FoundationMaine Community Found…
Louise Taft Semple FoundationOH23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Denver Foundation · The Buchwald Family Foundation · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Kennebec Savings Bank Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Onion Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Outer Cape Health Services Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Interfaith Works: 4% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Sheffield Historical Society: 2% of income from government
  • Edith Wharton Restoration Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc: 0% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 344 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marcia Brady Tucker’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home