Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership

Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership (Colorado) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $308,000 to it, the largest being THE COLORADO HEALTH FOUNDATION ($150,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$377k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$308k
Net assets
$388k
0/5 repeat funders
01What it does

What Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership does

Mission

To build power among housing-insecure residents of Colorado Springs to win concrete changes to city policy resource allocation and development processes needed to ensure everyone in Colorado Springs has a safe stable and affordable place to live.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2025 return the organization reported starting a significant new program and a significant change in how it conducts a program.

In 2025 The Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership began organizing tenants at Aviator Apartments to address issues in the building. We began working with tenants there in August organizing neighbors around shared issues and conducting food distributions. We also began supporting a local project called Mobile Arts which brings art programming to local community events and groups for free with a focus on youth programming.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).

The Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership paused its work organizing unhoused residents of Colorado Springs into the Colorado Springs Homeless Union. This work was difficult to sustain and becoming an undue draw on organizational resources and time.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Continuing to organize residents of Centennial Plaza and Acacia Park Apartments. Residents there got a majority of their neighbors to join their tenant association by the spring came up with a list of needed changes in the buildings and met with the leadership of the local housing authority to discuss and implement those changes. By organizing and advocating for themselves theyve developed a productive and accountable relationship with the Colorado Springs Housing Authority and built community in their apartment complexes.

    $55,231 spent
    37% of program spending
  2. Continuing to organize in the Mill Street neighborhood to get developers to come meet with them to help create solutions to affordable housing in the neighborhood. The Mill Street team met several times with Norwood Development a big local developer and was able to secure a commitment to building a new affordable housing development in the neighborhood.

    $37,832 spent
    25% of program spending
  3. Organizing tenants at Aviator Apartment Homes a 147-unit complex on N Murray Blvd. Tenants were experiencing issues such as mold lack of heat pest infestations and more. By coming together and putting pressure on their landlord they were able to get management to start taking those issues more seriously even though they refused to meet with the tenants.

    $22,587 spent
    15% of program spending
  4. Mobile Arts

    $18,689 spent
    13% of program spending
  5. Colorado Springs Homeless Union

    $14,283 spent
    10% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $148,622.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2024, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2024, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20242024 Revenue 100 ($191k) Expenses 100 ($23k) Net assets 100 ($252k)2025 Revenue 198 ($377k) Expenses 1064 ($240k) Net assets 154 ($388k)
20242025
Revenue (198)Expenses (1064)Net assets (154)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $252k to $388k (+54%).

$252k
$388k
20242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (38% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,355 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.

$168k
’24
$137k
’25
19
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Liam Reynolds

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

20242025
Listed55
Joined·+0
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership.

49%
largest funder
91%
top three
~3
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

99% of Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

CO
MD

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $131k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 5,255 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve19.4mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)98% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,255 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 38%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CO

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership?
Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership (Colorado) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $308,000 to it, the largest being THE COLORADO HEALTH FOUNDATION ($150,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $308,000 in grants to Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership.
Who is the largest funder of Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership?
THE COLORADO HEALTH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $150,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Colorado Springs Pro-Housing Partnership find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2024–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing