· Public charity
Council of Independent Colleges
The COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university leadership, advance institutional excellence, and enhance public understanding of private higher…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 176 grants below total $5,940,260 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,663,845 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $723,585 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k142 grants · $3.6M
- $50k–250k28 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES | $172,504 |
| INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OF TEXAS FOUNDATION | $155,500 |
| OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES | $134,500 |
| VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES | $131,000 |
| ASSOCIATED COLLEGES OF ILLINOIS | $128,000 |
| INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF INDIANA INC | $114,000 |
| IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $113,500 |
| FLORIDA INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND | $105,000 |
| WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC | $97,500 |
| THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY | $97,102 |
| SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES | $91,250 |
| ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT KENTUCKY COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES | $84,400 |
| MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND | $79,500 |
| COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT NEBRASKA COLLEGES FOUNDATION | $78,000 |
| MICHIGAN COLLEGES ALLIANCE | $68,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
288 repeat relationships — 138 still active in FY2025, 150 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $809k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +31%
- AOASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA5× · 2017–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +13%
- TOTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +19%
Funded once
- ICINDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES OF TEXAS INCone grant, 2024 · $153k · revenue +7%
- SHSETON HALL UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $43k · revenue +17%
- AOASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN NEW JERSEYone grant, 2024 · $43k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…
Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…
Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…
Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Schreiner University and the most unlike its peers is Louisiana Independent College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
400 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 400 of the 414 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc ↗
- Who funds ICUT Foundation ↗
- Who funds Independent Colleges of Indiana Inc ↗
- Who funds IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds VA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC ↗
- Who funds South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities ↗
- Who funds Michigan Colleges Alliance ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT NEBRASKA COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OF NEW JERSEY A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Lewis University ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS' INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC ↗
- Who funds DILLARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MEREDITH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OREGON ALLIANCE OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ↗
- Who funds BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGDON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · Ernst & Young Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Watson-Brown Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Council of Independent Colleges funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Norwich University — 14% of income from government
- Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University — 5% of income from government
- Linfield University — 4% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 2% of income from government
- Georgian Court University — 2% of income from government
- St Thomas University Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bay Path University — 1% of income from government
- Mitchell College — 1% of income from government
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 1% of income from government
- Assumption University — 1% of income from government
- Gordon College — 0% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Eckerd College — 0% of income from government
- Mount Saint Mary's University Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mcdaniel College Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.