Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

$4.8B
Granted FY2025still arriving
233
Grants FY2025still arriving
51
States reached
$5.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.7BCivil Rights$425k
02FY2025 · 233 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 233 grants below total $194,609,561 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,771,873,654 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,577,264,093 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k34 grants · $5.7M
  • $250k+189 grants · $189M
$619,895
Median grant
51
States reached
$572M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA FoodBank$5,161,046
Golden Harvest Food Bank$3,653,248
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest North Carolina$3,598,905
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank$3,142,984
Tarrant Area Food Bank$3,001,276
Atlanta Community Food Bank$2,947,329
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma$2,726,069
Mid-Ohio Foodbank$2,656,941
Treasure Coast Food Bank$2,561,114
Houston Food Bank$2,559,865
Maryland Food Bank$2,538,248
Feeding Tampa Bay$2,520,686
Second Harvest Food Bank of Greater New Orleans and Acadiana$2,450,502
Food Lifeline$2,337,524
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina$2,299,865
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $55.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Island Harvest: $1.7M → 6%Long Island Cares Inc: $1.2M → 7%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $2.1M → 19%Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas: $1.8M → 17%HACAP Food Reservoir: $1.0M → 9%Inter-Faith Food Shuttle: $1.7M → 8%FULFILL - (The FoodBank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc): $1.5M → 6%Feeding San Diego: $2.5M → 11%Island Harvest: $982k → 6%Long Island Cares Inc: $680k → 7%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1.6M → 19%Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas: $1.1M → 17%HACAP Food Reservoir: $910k → 9%Inter-Faith Food Shuttle: $1.3M → 8%FULFILL - (The FoodBank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc): $1.1M → 6%New Hampshire Food Bank: $1.4M → 7%Island Harvest: $710k → 6%Long Island Cares Inc: $527k → 7%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $1.5M → 19%Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas: $845k → 17%HACAP Food Reservoir: $828k → 9%Inter-Faith Food Shuttle: $854k → 8%SH Food Bank of Clark Champaign & Logan Counties: $657k → 15%FulFill (formerly FB of MonmouthOcean Cty): $954k → 6%Feeding America Southwest Virginia: $1.1M → 8%New Hampshire Food Bank: $1.1M → 7%FEEDING SAN DIEGO: $1.5M → 11%Island Harvest: $555k → 6%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $1.3M → 19%Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas: $767k → 17%HACAP Food Reservoir: $648k → 9%Mid-South Food Bank: $1.5M → 17%Inter-Faith Food Shuttle: $722k → 8%FULFILL - (The FoodBank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc): $825k → 6%New Hampshire Food Bank: $659k → 7%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $944k → 19%Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas: $594k → 17%HACAP Food Reservoir: $630k → 9%Inter-Faith Food Shuttle: $703k → 8%FULFILL - (The FoodBank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc): $689k → 6%New Hampshire Food Bank: $612k → 7%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $709k → 19%HACAP Food Reservoir: $579k → 9%FULFILL - (The FoodBank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc): $579k → 6%New Hampshire Food Bank: $527k → 7%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $699k → 19%MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $553k → 17%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $566k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7B · 276 repeat orgs$6.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

276 repeat relationships — 223 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

276
35

Total granted

$1.7B
$6.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+17%

Still filing today

92%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $326k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30M · revenue +205%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29M · revenue +107%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25M · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • FS
    Feeding South Florida
    one grant, 2017 · $771k
  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $541k · revenue +84%
  • OW
    OURSPACE WORLD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $450k · revenue 0% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Southern Iowa

Obtain, warehouse, and distribute food products to client agencies to help alleviate hunger in southern iowa communities.

—
2
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
3
Foothills Food Bank

The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.

—
4
Flathead Food Bank Inc

The Flathead Food Bank strives to elimnate hunger in the Flathead Valley through collaborative partnerships creating effective solutions to connect and strengthen individuals, families and the community through access to healthy nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Food Bank of San Benito County

Our mission is to provide food, nutritional education, and advocacy for those in need within san benito county, while pursuing our ultimate vision that no resident will suffer from hunger or malnutrition in san benito county.

Education
6
Emergency Food Bank

The mission of the emergency food bank is to build a stronger community by providing a safety net of food, nutrition and health education, job training and hope to residents of san joaquin county who find themselves in an emergency…

—
7
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
8
York County Food Bank

The mission of the york county food bank is to increase dignified access to nutritious food and community resources that enhance food security in york county.

—
9
Community Food Bank

To fight hunger and poverty by providing food, education, programs and resources to families in a dignified, personal and expeditious manner directly as a food pantry and as a food bank; without zip code restrictions.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Coralville Community Food Pantry

We believe that food is a human right and that food has the power to bring people together. Our vision is to build a stronger, healthier, and hunger-free Coralville community. Powered by community support, the Coralville Community Food…

Food & Nutrition
12
South County Community Food Bank

Providing nutritious food to low income families and individuals in south clatsop county

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Kodiak Baptist Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…United Way AffiliatesSenior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%64%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%81%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%2/319
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,246

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

289 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 289 of the 318 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
284/289
Grantees still filing
251/289
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+137 more — $1,120,784,403 · Food & Nutrition+137 moreLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $30,091,230 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD B…The Houston Food Bank — $28,731,149 · OtherThe Houston Food BankGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $21,700,519 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIA…NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $18,703,103 · OtherTarrant Area Food Bank — $15,633,228 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $15,119,711 · OtherTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $13,738,013 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $13,330,491 · Other+36 more — $236,489,845 · Other+36 moreSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc — $9,595,741 · Human ServicesACTION PATHWAYS INC — $8,664,878 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC — $6,351,982 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $6,334,898 · Human ServicesTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL — $6,276,906 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $5,712,627 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTD — $5,707,537 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS — $4,975,792 · Human ServicesHAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $4,904,257 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN — $4,435,334 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares Inc — $3,848,986 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $11,467,576 · Community ImprovementFEEDING TEXAS — $9,712,586 · Community ImprovementSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $5,353,587 · Community ImprovementCrawford-Sebastian Community Development Council Inc — $4,728,601 · Community ImprovementFEEDING PENNSYLVANIA — $14,312,639 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST OF THE GREATER VALLEY — $5,936,382 · PhilanthropyCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $3,055,359 · Housing & ShelterCOUNCIL OF ORANGE COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL — $2,816,674 · Religion
Food & Nutrition$1,120,784,403Other$393,537,289Human Services$66,808,938Community Improvement$31,262,350Philanthropy$20,249,021Housing & Shelter$3,055,359Religion$2,816,674

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $30,091,230 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $28,731,149 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $24,671,609 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $21,700,519 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $19,970,982 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $19,243,906 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $19,148,475 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $19,104,451 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $18,979,050 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $18,703,103 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $18,482,220 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $18,063,115 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $17,182,892 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $16,774,138 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $16,423,185 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $16,240,689 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $16,181,112 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $15,633,228 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetBANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC — $15,331,864 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $15,247,219 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $15,119,711 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC — $14,519,841 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $14,350,137 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $14,317,273 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetFEEDING PENNSYLVANIA — $14,312,639 over 9y, 74% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $14,052,284 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $13,738,013 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $13,466,290 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $13,330,491 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast — $13,067,121 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $12,479,005 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $12,328,314 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetPhilabundance — $12,327,422 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $12,322,733 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $12,091,727 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC — $12,042,281 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $11,996,052 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank — $11,945,607 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $11,775,556 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $11,537,294 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $11,467,576 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $11,291,592 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $11,268,068 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $11,126,189 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK — $10,837,771 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $10,827,790 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK — $10,745,592 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $10,600,803 over 9y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds BANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kroger Co Zero Hu…Farmlink ProjectMarni & Morris Propp …The Kroger Co Foundat…The Woodforest Charit…Northern Illinois Foo…Partnership for a Hea…The Caplan-Bensley Fo…Share Our StrengthThe Houston Food BankSimple Generosity Fou…The Westfield Insuran…
The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste FoundationOH75.4× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · Farmlink Project · Marni & Morris Propp II Family Foundation Inc · The Kroger Co Foundation · The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Partnership for a Healthier America Inc · The Caplan-Bensley Foundation · Share Our Strength · The Houston Food Bank · Simple Generosity Foundation · The Westfield Insurance Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Feeding America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Feeding Florida Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
150report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 318 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines