Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Partnership for a Healthier America Inc

Advancing equitable access to nutritious food for all in America to lead healthy lives.

$676k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.0MHuman Services$593kCivil Rights$216kHealth$130kRecreation & Sports$113kYouth Development$111kCommunity Improvement$73kInternational$60kArts & Culture$46kOther$1.5M
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 39 grants below total $615,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $675,658 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,158 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $520k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brighter Bites$50,000
Society of Arab American Neighborhood Development (SANAD)$35,000
Heath Education Council$30,000
City and County of Denver$30,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$30,000
City of Indianapolis$30,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$25,000
NeighborSpace$25,000
Food Research and Action Center$25,000
But God Ministries$23,000
Griot Arts Inc$15,000
Philabundance$15,000
Urban Strategies LLC$15,000
Griot Arts Inc$15,000
Higher Purpose Co$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $593k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 14%Hawkeye Area Community Action Program Inc: $70k → 9%Des Moines Area Religious Council: $50k → 10%Focus Hope: $25k → 8%The Other Way Ministries: $25k → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $25k → 21%Urban Strategies LLC: $15k → 21%Midwest Food Bank: $70k → 11%Coahoma Collective: $29k → 36%Center for Food Action in New Jersey: $15k → 7%Des Moines Area Religious Council: $25k → 10%Gateway Region Young Men's Christian Association: $120k → 21%STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%Greater Wichita YMCA: $10k → 16%Metropolitan Family Services: $8k → 14%Coahoma Collective: $12k → 36%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $25k → 14%Society of Arab American Neighborhood Development (SANAD): $35k → 14%Society of Arab American Neighborhood Development (SANAD): $8k → 14%Society of Arab American Neighborhood Development (SANAD): $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
KS
AR
TN
DC
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Partnership for a Healthier America Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Partnership for a Healthier America Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 19 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
75

Total granted

$1.0M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+14%

Still filing today

63%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    2× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +34%
  • KF
    KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +29%
  • WISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $59k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GR
    GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue +10%
  • DH
    DELTA HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $110k · revenue +17%
  • FO
    FRESHPOINT OF DENVER
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
4
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
8
Golden Harvest Food Bank Inc

Golden harvest food bank, inc.'s mission is "feeding lives together."

Food & Nutrition
9
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
10
Food Bank of Southern Iowa

Obtain, warehouse, and distribute food products to client agencies to help alleviate hunger in southern iowa communities.

—
11
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Society of Arab American Neighborhood Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyYmca Youth DevelopmentHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Senior Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%49%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%55%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/113
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,452

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/90
Grantees still filing
58/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $105,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORYKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK — $70,000 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $70,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $70,000 · Food & NutritionGreat Plains Food Bank — $70,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO — $70,000 · Food & NutritionRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR — $70,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $70,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $70,000 · Food & NutritionTerre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc — $70,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $70,000 · Food & NutritionEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK — $70,000 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 · Food & Nutrition+18 more — $423,450 · Food & Nutrition+18 moreDELTA HEALTH CENTER INC — $110,000 · OtherDELTA HEALTH CENTER INCFRESHPOINT OF DENVER — $99,870 · OtherFRESHPOINT OF DENVERCity of Indianapolis Dept Of Parks & Recreation — $96,000 · OtherCity of Indianapolis Dept Of Parks & Re…GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $78,000 · OtherSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK — $70,000 · OtherHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION — $70,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERS — $70,000 · OtherRACINE COUNTY PROJECT EMERGENCY INC — $70,000 · OtherHuman Agricultural Cooperative — $70,000 · OtherFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $70,000 · OtherWISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC — $58,750 · OtherBUT GOD MINISTRIES — $60,000 · Other+38 more — $734,500 · Other+38 moreGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $120,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY REGION…DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL — $75,000 · Human ServicesDES MOINES ARE…MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $70,000 · Human ServicesMIDWEST FOOD B…HAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesHAWKEYE AREA C…SOCIETY OF ARAB AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ARA…COAHOMA COLLECTIVE — $40,500 · Human ServicesCOAHOMA COLLEC…YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit — $25,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago — $25,000 · Human ServicesFOCUSHOPE — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES — $25,000 · Human Services+6 more — $67,500 · Human Services+6 moreREUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $216,340 · Civil RightsSOCIETY OF HEALTH AND PHYSICAL EDUCATORS — $89,828 · HealthHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL — $30,000 · HealthMEDICAL SOCIETY OF SEDGWICK COUNTY PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 · HealthNINE 13 INC — $93,000 · Recreation & SportsINDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $85,687 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Youth Development
Food & Nutrition$1,958,450Other$1,657,120Human Services$593,000Civil Rights$216,340Health$129,828Recreation & Sports$113,000Youth Development$110,687

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $216,340 over 2y, 15% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $120,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDELTA HEALTH CENTER INC — $110,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNINE 13 INC — $93,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF HEALTH AND PHYSICAL EDUCATORS — $89,828 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $85,687 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $78,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL — $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK — $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK — $70,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRACINE COUNTY PROJECT EMERGENCY INC — $70,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $70,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTerre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc — $70,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBUT GOD MINISTRIES — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC — $58,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $56,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETY OF ARAB AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetCOAHOMA COLLECTIVE — $40,500 over 2y, 36% of budgetMISSISSIPPI DELTA COUNCIL F0R WORKERS OPPORTUNITIES INC — $33,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGRIOT ARTS INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feeding AmericaThe Kroger Co Zero Hu…Northern Illinois Foo…Share Our StrengthCentral Indiana Commu…The Kroger Co Foundat…Farmlink ProjectThe Westfield Insuran…Greater Chicago Food …The Indianapolis Foun…American Water Charit…Enterprise Holdings F…
Feeding AmericaIL46.2× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feeding America · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Share Our Strength · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Kroger Co Foundation · Farmlink Project · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · Greater Chicago Food Depository · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Partnership for a Healthier America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
53report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines