Skip to content

Mississippi · Nonprofit

REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE

REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE (Mississippi) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,908,493 to it, the largest being Trustees of Tufts College ($500,637). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$389k
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$1.9M
Net assets
$100k
4/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 65%
01What it does

What Reuben V Anderson Center for Justice does

Mission

The Reuben V. Anderson Center for Justice was established to address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $48,266 spentof which $48,266 as grants$65,555 earned by the program
    14% of program spending
  2. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $19,230 spentof which $19,230 as grants$32,175 earned by the program
    6% of program spending
  3. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $142,079 spentof which $142,079 as grants$68,321 earned by the program
    42% of program spending
  4. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $4,500 spentof which $4,500 as grants$9,900 earned by the program
    1% of program spending
  5. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $8,981 spentof which $8,981 as grants$11,550 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  6. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $5,574 spentof which $5,574 as grants$3,590 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  7. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $11,275 spentof which $11,275 as grants$15,000 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  8. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $99,542 spentof which $99,542 as grants$100,000 earned by the program
    29% of program spending
  9. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $0 spent$25,000 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  10. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $0 spent$13,306 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  11. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $0 spent$10,000 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  12. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $0 spent$16,975 earned by the program
    0% of program spending
  13. Address systemic poverty and economic injustice through the programs in poverty reduction, educational advancement, criminal justice, access to quality health care, community and economic development.

    $0 spent$17,325 earned by the program
    0% of program spending

The 13 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $339,447.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($13k)2024 Revenue 59 ($666k) Expenses 54 ($628k) Net assets 388 ($51k)2025 Revenue 34 ($389k) Expenses 29 ($339k) Net assets 761 ($100k)
202320242025
Revenue (34)Expenses (29)Net assets (761)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $51k to $110k (+116%).

$13k
$51k
$110k
202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 6% · 2024 100% · 2025 100%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,975 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

−$30k
’23
$38k
’24
$49k
’25
3.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202320242025
Listed333
Joined·+0+0
No longer listed·00
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $60k → $728k.

1 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 26% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE.

26%
largest funder
75%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 83% · 2022 100% · 2023 69% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Mississippi, across 7 states in all.

IL
MA
PA
CA
DC
MS
AL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Mississippi out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $125k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 904 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin13% · above the median
Months of reserve3.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−41% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 904 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Mississippi

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MS

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE?
REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE (Mississippi) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,908,493 to it, the largest being Trustees of Tufts College ($500,637). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $1,908,493 in grants to REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE?
Trustees of Tufts College is the largest funder on record, with $500,637 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Mississippi. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Reuben V Anderson Center for Justice →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing