Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

MAP International Inc

MAP International is a Christian organization providing life-changing medicines and health supplies to people in need.

$1.3B
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

International$88kEducation$58k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $59,653 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,265,212,554 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,265,152,901 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$37,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$364M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Project Hope$37,500
Christian Medical & Dental Associations$22,153
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Project Hope: $38k → 14%Convoy of Hope: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $1.2B on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $1.2B to organizations and $39M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$669M · 54% · 68 grants · 177 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

Sub-Saharan Africa$394M · 32% · 57 grants · 193 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Program Services Cash · Health Promotion

Middle East and North Africa$99M · 8% · 10 grants · 11 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

South America$37M · 3% · 12 grants · 39 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Program Services Cash · Health Promotion

Russia and Neighboring States$35M · 3% · 5 grants · 8 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

East Asia and the Pacific$4.7M · 0% · 11 grants · 38 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

South Asia$4.1M · 0% · 5 grants · 22 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.5M · 0% · 3 grants · 5 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.1M · 0% · 9 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
2
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
3
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
4
Christian Health Center of Howard County

The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.

Health
5
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc

Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Good Samaritan Medical Clinic Inc

Providing medical services to the uninsured or under insured low income people

Human Services
7
Good Samaritan Health Center of Cobb Inc

The organization's mission is to spread the love of christ by providing quality healthcare to those in need.

Health
8
Community Care Clinic Inc

To provide health care to low-income persons in the community who do not have health insurance through disease prevention, continuity of care, and active follow-up, we can prmote the health and well-being of the community.

Health
9
Community of Hope Health Clinic

Provide free medical services for uninsured residents of shelby county, alabama.

Health
10
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
11
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
12
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shifa Healthcare & Community Services Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ups Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%57%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%43%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/118
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,447

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
91/94
Grantees still filing
55/94
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY — $57,619 · InternationalCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETYCONVOY OF HOPE — $50,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
International$145,119

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY — $57,619 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation IncCT74.4× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · Georgia Charitable Care Network Inc · Sostento Inc · Medshare International Inc · Georgia Health Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Georgia Health Initiative Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization MAP International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph