· Public charity
Heart to Heart International Inc
Heart to heart international seeks to improve healthcare access in the u.s.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $88,915 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $295,503,888 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $295,414,973 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC - LA CLINICA | $44,139 |
| TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF CHARITABLE CLINICS | $30,000 |
| CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC | $9,853 |
| FRIENDS IN NEED HEALTH CENTER INC | $4,923 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $283M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL4× · 2018–2022 · $246k · revenue +32%
- CECasa El Buen Samaritano2× · 2017–2018 · $128k · revenue +171%
- CICOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- HTHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -93% · 100% of their budget
- HTHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated6× · 2017–2023 · $200k · revenue +151%
- TLTRINIDAD LIFE COMMUNITY3× · 2019–2021 · $57k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.
Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.
To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.
Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.
We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.
Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.
The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.
To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.
The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Hope Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Garden of Eden Health Resort Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
300 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORPORACION DE SERVICIOS DE SALUD Y DESARROLLO SOCIOECONOMICO EL OTOAO ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Casa El Buen Samaritano ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Lone Star Assoc Charitable Clinics ↗
- Who funds PONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC ↗
- Who funds OCEANA COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Pathologists Overseas ↗
- Who funds Friends in Need Health Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Direct Relief · Health Forward Foundation · American Academy of Family Physicians Fdn · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Sostento Inc · Delta Dental of Missouri · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · MAP International Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heart to Heart International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oceana Community Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.