· Public charity
Sostento Inc
To meet the urgent needs of frontline health workers responding to public health emergencies and serving poor and marginalized patients.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $91,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $147,956 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,956 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bradley Free Clinic of Roanoke Valley | $6,500 |
| Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri | $6,500 |
| DuPage Health CoalitionAccess DuPage | $6,500 |
| St John Bosco Clinic | $6,500 |
| Mountain Hope Good Shepherd | $6,500 |
| Hope Clinic and Care Center Inc | $6,500 |
| People's Health Clinic Inc | $6,500 |
| Community Health-In-Partnership Services | $6,500 |
| Milan Puskar Health Right | $6,500 |
| Ozanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc | $6,500 |
| Centre Volunteers in Medicine | $6,500 |
| Ibn Sina Foundation Inc | $6,500 |
| St Vincent de Paul Community Pharmacy | $6,500 |
| Highlands Health Laurel Highlands Free & Charitab | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $318k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMOBILE CARE FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $147k · revenue +62%
- TGTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC2× · 2021–2022 · $133k · revenue +22%
- HHHIGHLANDS HEALTH2× · 2022–2023 · $77k · revenue +103%
Funded once
Health Connections Incorporatedone grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue -5%- SMST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INCone grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue -32%
Community Health NFPone grant, 2022 · $110k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.
Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.
Provide quality health care to mclean county's medically underserved residents through the operation of a free medical clinic.
Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.
To provide health care to low-income persons in the community who do not have health insurance through disease prevention, continuity of care, and active follow-up, we can prmote the health and well-being of the community.
To provide a medical home in Fayette County for lower-income, uninsured adults and caring for them always with Compassion and Respect for everyone.
Free and charitable meadical clinic that provides basic medical services, behavioral health assessments/counseling, well women's check ups, and dental services. opportunities provided for community volunteers and medical professionals.
The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.
Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.
To provide medical care to unisured low income patients.
The free clinics (tfc) enhances the healthcare system in henderson county and neighboring communities to ensure the accessibility of quality healthcare for uninsured, low-income clients. tfc works with volunteers and partnering healthcare…
The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Salaam Cleveland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOBILE CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IBN SINA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Health Connections Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health NFP ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF FREE & CHARITABLE CLINICS ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Helping Hands of Middle & West Tennessee ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ETHNE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Lower Rio Grande Valley Community Health Management ↗
- Who funds Lone Star Assoc Charitable Clinics ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Wisconsin Association of Free & Charitab ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION TRAVIS MERCY ↗
- Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
- Who funds Health Alliance for the Uninsured ↗
- Who funds IMMUNIZE KANSAS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for the Advancement of Minority Health ↗
- Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL COMMUNITY PHARMACY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds JACKSON FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HEALING BRIDGE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SHELBYVILLE AND BEDFORD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Friends in Need Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FINDLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHARIS HEALTH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · Tennessee Charitable Care Network · Georgia Charitable Care Network Inc · MAP International Inc · Smile 180 Foundation · Virginia Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Delta Dental of Virginia Foundation · Southern Health Plan Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sostento Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sostento Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sostento Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.