· Public charity
National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc
Building healthy communities for all through quality, equitable, accessible healthcare.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SLIOAM HEALTH | $45,000 |
| LIFECARE ALLIANCE | $45,000 |
| ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC | $45,000 |
| COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE | $45,000 |
| OHIO LATINO HEALTH NETWORK | $45,000 |
| MOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC | $45,000 |
| CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO | $45,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE - PA | $45,000 |
| WILL-GRUNDY MEDICAL CLINIC | $45,000 |
| HELPING HANDS HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER | $45,000 |
| ST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS | $30,000 |
| CLINICA ESPERANZA HOPE CLINIC | $30,000 |
| GRASSROOTS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| COLUMBUS FREE CLINIC | $30,000 |
| COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $875k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
102 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 79 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $433k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ISIBN SINA FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $510k · revenue +110%
- TTThe Texas International Institute of Health Professions6× · 2017–2024 · $431k · revenue +42%
- CCCHRIST CLINIC INC4× · 2017–2020 · $320k · revenue +596%
Funded once
- GHGOOD HEALTH CLINIC INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +27%
- RCROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $130k · revenue +32%
- SHSHEPHERD'S HOPE INCone grant, 2018 · $121k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide health care to low-income persons in the community who do not have health insurance through disease prevention, continuity of care, and active follow-up, we can prmote the health and well-being of the community.
To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.
Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.
Provide quality health care to mclean county's medically underserved residents through the operation of a free medical clinic.
To provide a medical home in Fayette County for lower-income, uninsured adults and caring for them always with Compassion and Respect for everyone.
Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.
Olivero Medical Health Center Inc is a nonprofit organization that provides high-quality comprehensive primary medical and oral healthcare services to everyone regardless of theirability to pay
The Hope Clinic recognizes, educates and medically treats patients who are without resources as well as link those who qualify to established programs to meet their needs. By providing preventative care and routine health maintenance,…
Orange county free clinics mission is to provide primary medical care to citizens of orange county who do not have resources to obtain these basic health care needs.
We provide medical services to uninsured and underinsured in our community. This year our mission included assisting the Rescue Mission with healthcare for their residents as well as seeing patients at our clinic.
The mission of the Clinic is to help adults move toward wellness by providing healthcare and pharmacy services. The Clinic accomplishes its mission by removing the barriers of limited financial resources and lack of health insurance.…
To spread the love of christ to the community by providing quality healthcare and spiritual guidance. the clinic's mission is to provide free medical care and spiritual guidance that minister to the whole person. the clinic will provide…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Hope Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Love Center for Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
262 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 262 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IBN SINA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Texas International Institute of Health Professions ↗
- Who funds UBI CARITAS A HEALING MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds CHRIST CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds TOMAGWA MINISTRIES INC DBA TOMAGWA HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds UHPHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Casa El Buen Samaritano ↗
- Who funds Grace Medical Home Inc ↗
- Who funds MIAMI RESCUE MISSION CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health NFP ↗
- Who funds LATINO LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Osceola County Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL COMMUNITY PHARMACY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds GOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE - SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds Care Ring Inc ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOTS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SMITHVILLE COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO LATINO HEALTH NEWTWORK ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds SYMBA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds C-ASSIST ↗
- Who funds HANDS TOGETHER FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WILL GRUNDY MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CAMINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH MIAMI BEACH MEDICAL CENTER IN ↗
- Who funds CLINICA TEPATI ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Heart to Heart International Inc · Sostento Inc · American Academy of Family Physicians Fdn · Charitable Healthcare Network Inc · Florida Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Cvs Foundation · MAP International Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Deaconess Health Associations Fund Inc · Pfizer Patient Assistance Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Osceola County Council on Aging Inc — 22% of income from government
- Homeless Emergency Project Inc — 15% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of Central Florida Inc — 3% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades — 3% of income from government
- People's Health and Wellness Clinic — 2% of income from government
- Presbyterian Counseling Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oceana Community Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.