Loading…
· Public charity
LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
Low-income housing the mission of l.a.
$3.8M
Granted FY2024
3
Grants
1
Communities
$895k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Human Services$6.0MCommunity Improvement$2.1MHousing & Shelter$2.0MHealth$1.6MOther$529k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
petpetsstayexperiencingvalleyprimary
2023
petexperiencingstaypetsvalleyprimary
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$626,847
Median grant
1
States reached
$160M
Total assets
Largest grants
- LAFHBUILDS INC$895,034
- HARMONY VILLA INC$626,847
- LAFH PERMANENT HOUSING CORP$369,248
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 12 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
2
Total granted
$10M
$128k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+81%
+26%
Still filing today
92%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHOPE OF THE VALLEY7× · 2017–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +1566%
- BTBRIDGE TO HOME-HOUSING NAVIGATION7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +1043% · 29% of their budget
NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORP6× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +81%
Funded once
- CFCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELone grant, 2021 · $100k
- SFSAN FERNANDO VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH-CESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Welcome Home Housing Inc
Welcome Home Housing is a non-profit organization in Sacramento California that provides affordable housing and services to individuals with mental illness.
Human Services
2
Shelter Partnership Inc
Collaboratively solving homelessness in los angeles county.
Housing & Shelter
3
Love Home Inc
Our mission is to provide suupporive housing with a safe and compassionate environment and assitance for those in need Our most significant activity is providing shared supportive housing.
Housing & Shelter
4
Burbank Housingsr Corporation
The corporation owns, operates, and manages affordable rental housing.
—
5
Inland Temporary Homes
To break the cycle of homelessness in the Inland Empire, by providing housing, case management, and ongoing support to families who have no place to live. This mission aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's…
—
6
Neighborhood Housing Services of
Neighborhood housing services of los angeles county (nhs) mission is to serve as a catalyst for residents, business, and government representatives to work together to build stronger neighborhoods, improve the quality of life for…
Housing & Shelter
7
Americas Homeless Veterans
Our Goal is to eradicate homelessness for our Veterans using our resources to support the transition from the street to permanent housing with the primary mission of providing the support to obtain and sustain housing, food and shelter for…
—
8
California Veterans Assistance
To provide programs to assist homeless veterans and veterans at risk of becoming homeless with personal skills, training and employment.
Human Services
9
Antelope Valley Domestic Violence
The Council is a community based organization dedicated to eliminating social and domestic violence and homelessness through community awareness, intervention, prevention, safe shelter and supportive services.
Human Services
10
Selah Neighborhood Homeless Coalition
Our mission is to build a community-led response to homelessness in los angeles that addresses the needs of our most vulnerable neighbors and activates an empowered coalition of participants, volunteers and partners.
Human Services
11
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.
Human Services
12
California Housing Partner Corporation
The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.
Unclassified
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home Again Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Pals N Pets Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$5,980,430Community Improvement$2,063,368Housing & Shelter$2,039,777Health$1,571,561Other$529,171
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE OF THE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HOMES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE TO HOME-HOUSING NAVIGATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORP ↗
- Who funds LAFHBUILDS INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY VILLA INC ↗
- Who funds TARZANA TREATMENT CENTER-HOUSING NAVIGATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds LAFH PERMANENT HOUSING CORP ↗
- Who funds ASCENCIA ↗
- Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS-HJC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE VERDUGOS ↗
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS-CASE MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH-CES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
California Community FoundationCA21.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Shelter Partnership Inc · United Way Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Providence Health System - So · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Valley Presbyterian Hospital
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LAFH PERMANENT HOUSING CORP.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 9.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 954171142 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LAFH PERMANENT HOUSING CORP, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 89% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to La Family Housing Corporation?
Find your warmest path to La Family Housing Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines