How much did SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES grant in FY2024?

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES reported 7 grants totaling $504,375 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES based?

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES is based in CA.

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES (sjpla) invests in, expands, and connects communities advancing racial and social justice by nurturing the wellbeing and leadership of those working towards more justice in los angeles.

$504k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$11k

Largest

01What you fund

0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$1.5MHousing & Shelter$769kCommunity Improvement$426kCrime & Legal$311kCivil Rights$154kEnvironment$110kEducation$74kHealth$67kYouth Development$48kOther$767k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

powerfulpitch awardcreateaccelerator fastfast pitch

2019

south baypitch awardaccelerator fastorganizingeconomiccounselinghealth

2020

accelerator paymentspayments fastpitch collectivecollective donationsdonations abolitionfast pitch

2021

frontline workersinvestment paymentsector investment

2022

frontline workerssee additionaladditional informationfontline workers

2023

homelesschange accelyouthsystem changesupportiveexperiencing homelessnessemployment

2024

change accelerationsystem change

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $34k
$10k–50k1 grant · $11k

$5,625

Median grant

States reached

$5.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

COMMUNITY PARTNERS$10,625
NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK$5,625
LA FORWARD INSTITUTE$5,625
THE LOS ANGELES UNITED METHODIST URBAN$5,625
FIDEICOMISO COMUNITARIO TIERRA LIBRE$5,625
ARCHITECTURE ADVOCACY$5,625
INTEGRATIVE COMMUNITIES INC$5,625

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.2M · 48 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +278% since the first grant, against +132% for the ones you funded once.

48 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.2M

$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+278%

+132%

Still filing today

92%

89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AS
A Step to Freedom
3× · 2021–2023 · $227k · revenue +20583%
NV
North Valley Caring Services Inc
3× · 2021–2023 · $220k · revenue +4246%
LA
Los Angeles Walks
7× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +278%

Funded once

JI
Jovenes Incgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue +249%
NO
Network on Women in Prison- fis sponsor Cal Coalition for Women Prisonersgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +174%
CR
Critical Resistancegraduated
one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +164%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Shelter Partnership Inc

Collaboratively solving homelessness in los angeles county.

Housing & Shelter

Community Bridge Housing Corp

We provide interim housing and social services with meaningful activities for people moving from institutions, or otherwise unsheltered, into housing and stability, particularly as alternatives to incarceration.

Housing & Shelter

Selah Neighborhood Homeless Coalition

Our mission is to build a community-led response to homelessness in los angeles that addresses the needs of our most vulnerable neighbors and activates an empowered coalition of participants, volunteers and partners.

Human Services

West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter

Inquilinos Unidos

Dedicated to empowering low-income tenants through community organizing, education and advocacy to fight for safe, decent and affordable housing in Los Angeles.

Unclassified

California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

Housing Rights Committee of

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education

Inner City Law Center

Fighting for justice and housing by providing legal representation for the homeless and working poor.

Crime & Legal

Los Angeles Habilitation House Inc

The mission of LAHH is to create and maintain job opportunities for people with disabilities in order that they develop, express, and apply their talents through their work and in their communities.

Employment

Insight Housing

Ensuring everyone in our community has a home through supportive, equitable and sustainable housing solutions.

Human Services

Housing Choices Coalition for Persons

To provide housing options for people with developmental and other disabilities.

Housing & Shelter

Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles

To foster interest among its community members in social community economic and environmental conditions and growth. and to assist in the development of affordable housing in southern california by providing housing development and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Works and the most unlike its peers is Tides Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/107

the rest of the field

13%

6,640/49,709

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

102 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

97/102

Grantees still filing

87/102

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$1,542,151Housing & Shelter$768,634Other$956,332Community Improvement$425,623Crime & Legal$310,870Civil Rights$153,589Environment$110,435

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way IncCA76× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Inc · California Community Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The California Endowment · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Christ-Centered Ministries

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Holliday's Helping Hands Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 844400983 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Holliday's Helping Hands Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Social Justice Partners Los Angeles?

Find your warmest path to Social Justice Partners Los Angeles through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

102 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Social Justice Partners Los Angeles?

More from the funding graph

SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

102 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Social Justice Partners Los Angeles?

More from the funding graph