· Public charity
Dignity Community Care
As an affiliate of commonspirit health (commonspirit), DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE is committed to improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $999k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+11 grants · $80M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIGNITY HEALTH MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $55,103,205 |
| DIGNITY HEALTH | $7,205,525 |
| PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH CENTERS | $6,945,517 |
| CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST | $2,459,408 |
| CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $1,845,905 |
| SEQUOIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,668,068 |
| NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,498,678 |
| FRENCH HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $1,424,470 |
| WOODLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $638,643 |
| GLENDALE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $623,421 |
| MARICOPA COUNTY SPECIAL HEALTH CARE DISTRICT | $525,280 |
| YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES | $105,000 |
| HOPE FOR ADDICTION INC | $91,216 |
| WIND YOUTH SERVICES INC | $86,500 |
| CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES | $85,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DHDIGNITY HEALTH5× · 2021–2025 · $709M · revenue +15%
- DHDIGNITY HEALTH MEDICAL FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $297M · revenue +40%
- PCPACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH CENTERS2× · 2024–2025 · $12M · revenue +6%
Funded once
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEYone grant, 2019 · $110k · revenue +2%
- DWDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTERone grant, 2024 · $90k · revenue 0%
- SDSACRAMENTO DISTRICT COUNCIL ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYone grant, 2024 · $83k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.
To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
See schedule oour mission is to provide quality, affordable, community-sensitive health care and other services to the underserved communities of greater los angeles, regardless of their ability to pay, by upholding the legacy and…
The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Lifting Communities and the most unlike its peers is Wender Weis Foundation for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
145 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 145 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds SEQUOIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRENCH HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLENDALE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DBA WOODLAND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEAVE INC ↗
- Who funds YOLO COMMUNITY CARE CONTINUUM ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds St Francis Center ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY OUT ↗
- Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds WOMENS HEALTH INNOVATIONS OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds LUMINA ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds WINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
- Who funds Pan de Vida Foundation ↗
- Who funds Hope for Addiction Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds WIND YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dignity Health · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Yolo Community Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Arizona Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dignity Community Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.