Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sunair Foundation

Sunair Children's Foundation is a non-profit corporation providing the funds for other exempt organizations to assist in the medical care and treatment of children

$358k
Granted FY2022
19
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Sunair Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of Los Angeles, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Sunair Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 18 organizations, $358k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’17
20
’18
18
’19
22
’20
22
’21
18
’22
1
’23
4
’24
1
’25
1
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$525kPhilanthropy$315kEducation$205kHousing & Shelter$199kCrime & Legal$123kCommunity Improvement$113kYouth Development$98kOther$0
02FY2022 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
One Generation$25,000
Childrens Burn Foundation$20,000
USC Medical Center$20,000
Peace Over Violence$20,000
LA Family Housing$20,000
Executive Service Corps$20,000
Vista Del Mar$20,000
Childrens Hospital of Los Ang$20,000
Helpline Youth Counseling Inc$20,000
Venice Family Clinic$20,000
Hillview Mental Health$20,000
Ahead with Horses$20,000
Northridge Hospital$20,000
Blind Childrens Center$20,000
School on Wheels$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–26, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Vista Del Mar: $20k → 14%Vista Del Mar: $20k → 14%Vista Del Mar: $20k → 14%Vista Del Mar: $20k → 14%Vista Del Mar: $20k → 14%Vista Del Mar: $15k → 14%Mychals Learning Place: $10k → 14%Mychals Learning Place: $10k → 14%Mychals Learning Place: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 14%Guide Dogs for the Blind: $10k → 14%MEND: $18k → 14%Jewish Family Services: $100k → 14%Jewish Family Services: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 25 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$2.3M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+42%

Still filing today

88%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +293%
  • TB
    The Blind Childrens Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +46%
  • O
    ONEGENERATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $135k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • CF
    Center for the Partially sight
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • FR
    FAMILY RESCUE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +42%
  • MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
2
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
3
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
4
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
5
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
6
South Central Los Angeles Regional Center for Dev Disabled Persons Inc

South central los angeles regional center, (sclarc), believes special needs deserve special attention. we are committed to the provision of culturally sensitive services which enhance the inherent strengths of the family and enable…

Human Services
7
The Los Angeles Free Clinic

To provide outstanding, compassionate care to anyone who needs it.

Health
8
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
9
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
10
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
11
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
12
Children's Dental Foundation

To deliver oral health education and comprehensive treatment for economically disadvantaged children, including those with complex medical considerations, while also providing premier training in pediatric and multi-specialty dentistry.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy and the most unlike its peers is Sunair Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr10%45%35–55yr12%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%13%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr10%53%35–55yr12%23%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
16%
7,867/49,781

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $145,000 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONONEGENERATION — $135,000 · OtherONEGENERATIONPEACE OVER VIOLENCE — $125,000 · OtherPEACE OVER VIOLENCECHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION — $120,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATIONB A R K — $50,000 · OtherB A R KBARK THERAPY DOGS — $40,000 · OtherASCENCIA — $54,000 · OtherASCENCIASRD-STRAIGHTENING REINS FOUNDATION — $38,000 · Other+5 more — $58,000 · Other+5 moreHILLVIEW MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $120,000 · HealthHILLVIEW MENTAL HEALTH C…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $120,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICAHEAD WITH HORSES INC — $120,000 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INCChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $119,800 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los …YOUNG & HEALTHY — $100,000 · HealthYOUNG & HEALTHY+1 more — $10,000 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $315,331 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY …NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $120,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE HOSPIT…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $119,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY S…VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $115,000 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR C…JOHN TRACY CLINIC — $60,000 · Human ServicesJOHN TRACY CLIN…MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE — $30,000 · Human ServicesMYCHALS LEARNIN…International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $20,000 · Human ServicesMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity — $17,500 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesThe Blind Childrens Center Inc — $140,000 · EducationThe Blind Ch…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $95,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WH…AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEW…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…EXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $112,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $40,000 · Community ImprovementHelpline Youth Counseling Inc — $120,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$765,000Health$589,800Philanthropy$435,331Human Services$375,500Education$305,000Community Improvement$152,500Crime & Legal$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $315,331 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $145,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc — $140,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetONEGENERATION — $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE — $125,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHILLVIEW MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAHEAD WITH HORSES INC — $120,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHelpline Youth Counseling Inc — $120,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $119,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $119,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $112,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG & HEALTHY — $100,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetASCENCIA — $54,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSRD-STRAIGHTENING REINS FOUNDATION — $38,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetMYCHALS LEARNING PLACE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESCUE CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity — $17,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSunair Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills Founda…California Community …The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationS Mark Taper Foundati…The Green FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sempra FoundationQueensCareUnihealth Foundation
The Rose Hills FoundationCA23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sempra Foundation · QueensCare · Unihealth Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sunair Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sunair Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sunair Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines