· Public charity
Wildlife Conservation Society
The Wildlife Conservation Society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 39 grants below total $6,949,680 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $24,128,708 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,179,028 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $380k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+6 grants · $4.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Partners for Development (PfD) | $1,266,855 |
| Environmental Defense Fund Inc | $973,690 |
| Internews Network | $928,428 |
| Catholic Relief Services USCCB | $803,979 |
| Woods Hole Oceanographic | $528,210 |
| University of Alaska | $268,888 |
| Rare Inc | $219,565 |
| ADM Capital Foundation Inc | $206,000 |
| Nature Conservancy | $147,189 |
| EpiEcos | $120,240 |
| North Slope Borough | $104,158 |
| Tucson Audubon Society Inc | $100,000 |
| Natural Resources Foundation of Wisconsin Inc | $100,000 |
| Methow Salmon Recovery Foundation | $99,576 |
| STONE BARNS RESTORATION Corp | $90,199 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $17M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $16M to organizations and $941k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Conservation · Conservation-EU
Stated purpose: Conservation · Scholarship-EA · Conservation-EA
Stated purpose: Conservation · Conservation-CA
Stated purpose: Conservation · Conservation-Sub · Scholarship-Sub
Stated purpose: Conservation · Conservation-So Am · Scholarship-So Am
Stated purpose: CONSERVATION · Conservation-So As · Scholarship-So As
Stated purpose: Conservation · Conservation-NA
Stated purpose: Conservation · CONSERVATION-RU
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
103 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $603k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +62%- AWAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +54%
- JGJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION6× · 2017–2022 · $1.7M · revenue +50%
Funded once
- AWAlaska Wildlife Allianceone grant, 2024 · $155k · revenue 0% · 30% of their budget
- TWTREES WATER AND PEOPLEone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +10%
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONALone grant, 2024 · $149k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…
Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
The Natura Bolivia Foundation is dedicated to implementing, and evaluating the impact of conservation and development programs, with a focus on watershed conservation, protected areas, and incentive based conservation in Bolivia. We work…
Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.
Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Segal Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds REWILD ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds RARE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ADM CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds FOREST TRENDS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Piikani Lodge Health Institute ↗
- Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds METHOW SALMON RECOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION OF ↗
- Who funds Tucson Audubon Society ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SKY ISLAND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds GARDEN ISLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Stone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Patagoniaorg · National Forest Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · Wilburforce Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Weeden Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wildlife Conservation Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lomakatsi Restoration Project — 100% of income from government
- New Haven - Urban Resources Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- African Aquatic Conservation Fund Inc — 55% of income from government
- Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
- Manomet Inc — 12% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Desert Association — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- University of Maryland Alumni Association — 1% of income from government
- Tualatin Riverkeepers Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.