Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Montana · Nonprofit

WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE

WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE (Montana) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $154,877 to it, the largest being Wildlife Conservation Society ($111,455). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$144k
Revenue FY2024
3
Funders on record
$155k
Grants received
$14k
Net assets
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%

Against its field

WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE's revenue fell 62% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve1.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−13% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,260 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($376k) Expenses 100 ($342k) Net assets 100 ($39k)2018 Revenue 98 ($370k) Expenses 116 ($398k) Net assets 27 ($11k)2019 Revenue 130 ($491k) Expenses 145 ($497k) Net assets 13 ($5k)2020 Revenue 124 ($466k) Expenses 122 ($418k) Net assets 135 ($53k)2021 Revenue 42 ($159k) Expenses 54 ($185k) Net assets 70 ($27k)2022 Revenue 35 ($130k) Expenses 39 ($132k) Net assets 64 ($25k)2023 Revenue 30 ($113k) Expenses 36 ($125k) Net assets 33 ($13k)2024 Revenue 38 ($144k) Expenses 42 ($143k) Net assets 35 ($14k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (38)Expenses (42)Net assets (35)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 76% · 2018 97% · 2019 94% · 2020 96% · 2021 95% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 100%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,616 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$34k
17
$29k
18
$6k
19
$48k
20
$26k
21
$2k
22
$12k
23
$596
24
1.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $89k → $8k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
total
funders
1
1
2
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE.

72%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 73% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE draws 72% of its grant income from funders outside Montana, across 2 states in all.

MT
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
Montana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $300k on record.

Federal$300k
grants $300kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$300k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE?
WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE (Montana) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $154,877 to it, the largest being Wildlife Conservation Society ($111,455). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $154,877 in grants to WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE?
Wildlife Conservation Society is the largest funder on record, with $111,455 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WATERSHED RESTORATION COALITION FOR THE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing