Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Alaska · Nonprofit

ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION

ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION (Alaska) receives grants from 80 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,947,521 to it, the largest being TRUE NORTH FOUNDATION ($2,581,087). 53 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$8.0M
Revenue FY2025
80
Funders on record
$11M
Grants received
$17M
Net assets
53/80 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 54%

Against its field

ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 881 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin25% · above the median
Months of reserve2.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 881 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.8M) Net assets 100 ($10M)2018 Revenue 114 ($2.9M) Expenses 95 ($2.6M) Net assets 103 ($11M)2019 Revenue 121 ($3.1M) Expenses 88 ($2.4M) Net assets 118 ($12M)2020 Revenue 137 ($3.5M) Expenses 88 ($2.4M) Net assets 125 ($13M)2021 Revenue 109 ($2.7M) Expenses 95 ($2.6M) Net assets 146 ($15M)2022 Revenue 159 ($4.0M) Expenses 116 ($3.2M) Net assets 131 ($13M)2023 Revenue 167 ($4.2M) Expenses 162 ($4.5M) Net assets 136 ($14M)2024 Revenue 226 ($5.7M) Expenses 197 ($5.5M) Net assets 144 ($15M)2025 Revenue 318 ($8.0M) Expenses 219 ($6.1M) Net assets 162 ($17M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (318)Expenses (219)Net assets (162)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 42% · 2022 20% · 2023 39% · 2024 41% · 2025 28%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

87% of ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,285 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$249k
17
$241k
18
$623k
19
$1.0M
20
$112k
21
$795k
22
$281k
23
$245k
24
$2.0M
25
2.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 21 funders to 34 funders, grant income rose $1.4M → $1.7M.

22 of 80 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 80 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 24% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

24%
largest funder
50%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 64% · 2018 38% · 2019 30% · 2020 20% · 2021 31% · 2022 31% · 2023 27%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

45% of ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Alaska, across 18 states in all.

AK
WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DE
NC
DC
LA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Alaska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.6M arriving through sponsors registered in 14 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 80 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $7.2M on record.

Federal$7.2M
grants $7.2Mcontracts $17k
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$3.2M
  • Department of Agriculture$2.7M
  • Denali Commission$1.2M
  • National Science Foundation$220k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alaska

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 15%Fundraising 5%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 25 states

ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
RI
UT
MO
WV
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
SC
OK
MS

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION?
ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION (Alaska) receives grants from 80 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,947,521 to it, the largest being TRUE NORTH FOUNDATION ($2,581,087). 53 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 80 organizations giving $10,947,521 in grants to ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION, 53 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION?
TRUE NORTH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,581,087 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ALASKA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 80funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing