Skip to content

Hawaii · Nonprofit

PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION

PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION (Hawaii) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,304,954 to it, the largest being NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ($5,164,716). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.3M
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$7.3M
Net assets
$566k
8/18 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Pacific Rim Conservation does

Mission

Our mission is to maintain and restore native species and ecosystems through habitat protection and management, threat control, public education, and scientific research to develop and improve conservation methods. We provide biological research and management services to government agencies, other non-profit organizations, landowners, and a variety of other groups throughout the hawaiian islands and the pacific region.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. We work together with local communities, government agencies, and other conservation organizations to achieve our goals; we are a solidly 'boots on the ground organization. We do this by creating 'islands' within islands where predators have either been removed and excluded through fencing or are controlled on a long term basis. We then work to restore the habitat in these areas, and in some cases, bring bird species back that are no longer found there through translocation and social attraction. Throughout all of our work, we actively conduct research to understand avian biology, and the ecosystem changes and benefits to inform future conservation actions. To date, we have published more than 142 peer-reviewed papers in high-profile scientific journals and one full length book, and have had our work featured in media outlets such as the new york times, national geographic and the bbc.

    $1,250,427 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,250,427.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($922k) Net assets 100 ($299k)2018 Revenue 94 ($985k) Expenses 103 ($950k) Net assets 128 ($384k)2019 Revenue 87 ($919k) Expenses 136 ($1.3M) Net assets 17 ($52k)2020 Revenue 185 ($1.9M) Expenses 168 ($1.6M) Net assets 150 ($448k)2021 Revenue 205 ($2.2M) Expenses 229 ($2.1M) Net assets 166 ($497k)2022 Revenue 127 ($1.3M) Expenses 153 ($1.4M) Net assets 144 ($429k)2023 Revenue 116 ($1.2M) Expenses 101 ($930k) Net assets 242 ($722k)2024 Revenue 126 ($1.3M) Expenses 161 ($1.5M) Net assets 189 ($566k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (126)Expenses (161)Net assets (189)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $330k to $687k (+108%).

$300k
$507k
$330k
$687k
$816k
$493k
$840k
$727k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 40% · 2018 36% · 2019 8% · 2020 12% · 2021 7% · 2022 4% · 2023 12% · 2024 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$131k
’17
$35k
’18
−$332k
’19
$396k
’20
$49k
’21
−$68k
’22
$293k
’23
−$157k
’24
5.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed55565556
Joined·+1+0+1+0+0+0+1
No longer listed·1001000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $261k → $708k.

6 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

86% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION.

71%
largest funder
90%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 76% · 2019 47% · 2020 65% · 2021 88% · 2022 75% · 2023 69% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Hawaii, across 9 states in all.

WA
NY
CA
UT
VA
DC
HI
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Hawaii out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $220k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION's funding base is broadening — from 2 funders to 7 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−12% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $954k on record.

Federal$954k
grants $24kcontracts $931k
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$886k
  • Department of Defense$68k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Hawaii

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
33%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

94%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

CA
HI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION?
PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION (Hawaii) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,304,954 to it, the largest being NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ($5,164,716). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $7,304,954 in grants to PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION?
NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $5,164,716 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Hawaii. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pacific Rim Conservation →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing