· Private foundation
Wayfarer Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k115 grants · $13M
- $250k+11 grants · $9.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HORACE HOLLEY FOUNDATION | $4,500,000 |
| NATIONAL SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE BAHA'IS OF THE UNITED STATES | $1,750,000 |
| MONA FOUNDATION | $650,000 |
| NATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FREEDOM CENTER INC | $500,000 |
| NEW ERA CREATIVE SPACE | $370,000 |
| PARENT UNIVERSITY | $362,200 |
| TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER | $340,000 |
| EQUITICITY | $325,000 |
| PALENKE ARTS | $290,000 |
| FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA INC | $270,000 |
| MIRACLE MESSAGES | $255,000 |
| PROTEUS FUND | $225,000 |
| FETZER INSTITUTE | $210,000 |
| WORLD FEDERALIST MOVEMENT INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL POLICY | $205,000 |
| CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN EDUCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT | $203,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
140 repeat relationships — 110 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMONA FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +22% · 25% of their budget
- NUNATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FREEDOM CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +86%
- CRCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +2% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- EEMBARCone grant, 2023 · $450k
- BFBROSS FAMILY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $377k
- CUCOMMUNITY UNITED SERVICES INCone grant, 2023 · $357k · revenue +239%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Oakland Institute, an independent policy think tank, works to support global struggles for Indigenous rights, human rights, and land rights and to promote public participation and fair debate on critical social, economic, and…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
The mission of the Black Researchers Collective is to advance racial equity by training and equipping communities with research tools to be more civically engaged and policy informed.
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
Revolution Institute's purpose is to liberate the expansive potential of African-American and Latinx communities through sustainable, future-oriented work, entrepreneurship, and value-aligned collaborations.
Nexus' mission is to build more engaged and powerful communities by supporting community building initiatives that expand community wealth and foster social and human capital.
The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…
To transform the experiences, outcomes, and life options for children & families who have been historically underserved by our institutions and systems.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
We collaborate with youth of color in their learning and development journey providing experiences and resources for critical thinking, exploring voice, deepening brilliance, and contributing to the health and renewal of their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is The John Noffo Kahn and Mark Addison Foundation Inc C/O John Noffo Kahn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
189 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 189 of the 248 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FREEDOM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGHWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ERA CREATIVE SPACE INC ↗
- Who funds Equiticity ↗
- Who funds TANENBAUM CENTER FOR INTERRELIGIOUS UNDERSTANDING ↗
- Who funds CENTER ON MODERNITY IN TRANSITION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR RACE AMITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOOKS AND BREAKFAST ↗
- Who funds Claremont Graduate University ↗
- Who funds TRUTH FOR JUSTICE RIGHTS IN IRAN ↗
- Who funds ORGANIC ONENESS ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FREEDOMS INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE PONY EXPRESS ↗
- Who funds Palenke Arts ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE MESSAGES ↗
- Who funds SERVICE LEARNING MICROSCHOOL ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WOZU INC ↗
- Who funds MANIDOO OGITIGAAN ↗
- Who funds DARA Inc ↗
- Who funds INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HOPA MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds MAIA ↗
- Who funds LATINOS FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Field Foundation of Illinois · Ndn Collective Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · First Nations Development Institute · Circle of Service Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Joyce Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wayfarer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- Sharing Sacred Spaces Inc — 12% of income from government
- Community Service Care Inc — 10% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc — 1% of income from government
- Period Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wayfarer Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wayfarer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.