Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc

Support of indigenous people's programs

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$2.5MArts & Culture$1.8MCommunity Improvement$1.5MEnvironment$1.1MHealth$828kEducation$602kCivil Rights$281kPhilanthropy$231kAnimals$217kOther$5.0M
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $790,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,500,448 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,710,448 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $650k
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUK DUK GOOSE INC$150,000
NORTHERN CHEYENNE FOOD PANTRY$100,000
BEAUCHAMP KITCHEN$50,000
CROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM$50,000
EUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT$50,000
FORT BELKNAP ELDERS HELPING ELDERS$50,000
INSTITUTE OF NATIVE KNOWLEDGE$50,000
EKVN-YEFOLECV$50,000
IGIUGIG VILLAGE COUNCIL$50,000
OAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE$50,000
BLUE CREEK AH PAH VILLAGE$30,000
CIHUAPACTLI COLLECTIVE$30,000
WACIYANPI$30,000
YELLOWSTONE PEOPLES$20,000
CANTE WAUNSILIPI WI TA OMINICIYE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEEDS OF HARMONY INC: $35k → 28%THE NORTHEAST NATIVE NETWORK OF KINSHIP AND HEALING INC: $33k → 8%NEBRASKA INDIAN CHILD WELFARE COALITION INC: $20k → 16%DAKOTA WICOHAN - WIKOSKA & WICIYENA GIRLS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $50k → 11%SNQWEYIMISTN: $25k → 18%CENTER POLE: $20k → 23%AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 9%TARAHAT WOMEN'S CEREMONIAL SOCIETY: $25k → 14%THREE SISTERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 12%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $50k → 18%MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS: $20k → 19%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $50k → 12%MANIILAQ FAMILY CRISIS CENTERWOMEN'S CENTER: $50k → 20%RAMAPOUGH CULTURE AND LAND FOUNDATION: $30k → 6%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $35k → 10%IAMLEGACY: $50k → 8%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD INC: $40k → 22%CENTER POLE: $20k → 23%NATIVE DADS NETWORK: $50k → 12%KNO'QOTI NATIVE WELLNESS: $20k → 17%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $50k → 18%Maniilaq Association: $36k → 20%YUP'IK WOMEN'S COALITION (YWC): $50k → 30%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 10%BRAVE HEART SOCIETY: $30k → 22%WILD HORSE BUTTE CDC: $30k → 31%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $35k → 18%NATIVE DADS NETWORK: $30k → 12%SAAD K'IDILYE: $30k → 14%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $25k → 18%YUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION: $50k → 30%wild horse butte community development: $20k → 31%KNIFE CHIEF BUFFALO NATION SOCIETY: $30k → 42%NATIVE DADS NETWORK: $30k → 12%UNITED NATIONS PERMANENT FORUM ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES: $39k → 17%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $22k → 18%CHUGACHMIUT: $50k → 10%Chugachmiut: $25k → 10%XKKF (XAADAS KIL KUYAAS FOUNDATION): $50k → 15%YUP'IK WOMEN'S COALITION: $50k → 30%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $40k → 42%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 42%HOPI-TEWA WOMEN'S COALITION TO END ABUSE: $30k → 26%Yup'ik Women's Coalition: $50k → 30%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $100k → 12%SOVEREIGN BODIES INSTITUTE: $30k → 18%TWO FEATHERS NATIVE AMERICAN SERVICES: $25k → 18%AFFILIATE WINGS - CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $69k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $1.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.4M · 91% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

South America$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

East Asia and the Pacific$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

South Asia$30k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.8M · 108 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

108 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 101 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
184

Total granted

$8.8M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+21%

Still filing today

74%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $313k · revenue +8%
  • NM
    NATIVE MOVEMENT
    4× · 2017–2022 · $223k · revenue +945%
  • EW
    EMMONAK WOMEN'S SHELTER
    4× · 2017–2022 · $200k · revenue +244%

Funded once

  • IS
    INQUIRING SYSTEMS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $241k · revenue +49%
  • CD
    CENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $89k · revenue +192% · 30% of their budget
  • GI
    GEDAKINA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue -21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
2
Native Healing Llc
Animals
3
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
4
Ratiwennahawi Inc

Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans

Education
5
Native American Agriculture Fund
Food & Nutrition
6
International Indigenous Fund for Development and Solidarity Batani
International
7
The Foundation for Indigenous Education Leadership Development
Education
8
Womanshare Legacy

Womanshare Legacy is an educational, financial and cultural resource for women who may be facing challenges because of discrimination, lack of opportunities or scarcity of personal support. Womanshare Legacy works locally with women,…

Human Services
9
Naa Kaani Native Program

The naa kaani native program strives to educate and empower native communities in the pacific norhtwest, with a focus on the salish sea territory. we support cultural events, advocate for tribal rights, and aim to improve lives and…

Community Improvement
10
Native American Fiber Program
Environment
11
The Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation

We are a Native-led Indigenous rights organization. We are dedicated to our mission of protecting & revitalizing Indigenous cultures, empowering them in the direct application of their traditional knowledge & practices on their ancestral…

Arts & Culture
12
Tataviam Land Conservancy

To restore the unceded ancestral homelands of the FTBMI by implementing protective land management strategies, traditional ecological knowledge, and climate-resilient initiatives. By holding lands in perpetuity, TLC works to prevent the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Yoyot Spqni. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local Food System Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Development ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Social ServicesCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%9%<5yr14%28%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%1%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%26%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
19/303
the rest of the field
13%
240,378/1,819,262

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

219 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 219 of the 307 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
82
Early backer (in before they grew)
204/219
Grantees still filing
140/219
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUK DUK GOOSE — $355,000 · OtherDUK DUK GOOSEEMMONAK WOMEN'S SHELTER — $200,000 · OtherUnited Tribes of Bristol Bay — $190,000 · Other+82 more — $4,301,023 · Other+82 moreSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $313,208 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FU…YUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION — $200,000 · Human ServicesYUPIK WOMEN'S COALITI…EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE — $169,000 · Human ServicesEKVNV YEFOLECVLKEALASKA WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER — $150,000 · Human ServicesALASKA WOMENS RESOURC…NATIVE DADS NETWORK INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesNATIVE DADS NETWORK I…TEWA WOMEN UNITED — $110,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTE — $88,760 · Human ServicesManiilaq Association — $86,000 · Human Services+26 more — $1,157,924 · Human Services+26 moreCihuapactli Collective — $180,000 · Arts & CultureCihuapactli Co…Jilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center — $150,000 · Arts & CultureJilkaat Kwaan …EUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT INC — $136,200 · Arts & CultureEUCHEE YUCHI L…Blue Bird LifeWays — $125,000 · Arts & CultureBlue Bird Life…Native Peoples Action Community Fund — $100,000 · Arts & CultureNative Peoples…INDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS — $95,000 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS LIF…CALIFORNIA INDIAN BASKETWEAVERS ASSOCIATION — $85,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST PEOPLES FUND — $65,000 · Arts & CultureMIWOK HERITAGE CENTER — $60,000 · Arts & CultureWHYHUNGER INC — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more — $662,198 · Arts & Culture+16 moreINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $241,010 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SY…NATIVE MOVEMENT — $223,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEM…RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $150,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL ALASKA…ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC — $140,000 · Community ImprovementALEUTIAN PRI…TEXAS TRIBAL BUFFALO PROJECT — $120,000 · Community ImprovementTEXAS TRIBAL…IMPACT INC — $105,000 · Community ImprovementIMPACT INCFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE — $70,000 · Community ImprovementGEDAKINA INC — $65,000 · Community ImprovementCOHARIE INTRA-TRIBAL COUNCIL INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementAJO CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE — $50,000 · Community Improvement+6 more — $173,000 · Community Improvement+6 moreNEW VENTURE FUND — $175,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTU…SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $150,000 · EnvironmentSITKA CON…SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $110,000 · EnvironmentSOGOREA T…Cultural Fire Management Council — $100,000 · EnvironmentCultural …NATIVE CONSERVANCY — $85,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE CO…KAHEA THE HAWAIIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE — $60,000 · EnvironmentKAHEA THE…WHITESWAN ENVIRONMENTAL WE — $55,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTALISM THROUGH INSPIRATION & NONVIOLENT ACTION — $50,000 · EnvironmentFIRST PEOPLE'S CONSERVATION COUNCIL — $50,000 · EnvironmentUNKITAWA — $45,000 · EnvironmentRios to Rivers — $40,000 · Environment+5 more — $147,000 · Environment+5 moreOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE — $160,000 · HealthHEALING NATIVE HEARTS COALITION — $150,000 · HealthMESSENGERS FOR HEALTH — $136,000 · HealthURBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE INC — $90,000 · HealthCalifornia Indian Environmental Alliance — $87,000 · HealthHIPEEXNU KII U NUUN WISIIX — $54,000 · Health+4 more — $97,500 · HealthUNITING RESILIENCE — $75,000 · EducationSalish School of Spokane — $75,000 · EducationSPIRET FOUNDATION — $55,000 · EducationKumeyaay Community College Inc — $50,000 · EducationXKKF — $50,000 · EducationBLACKFEET COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $50,000 · EducationRESOURCES FOR INDIAN STUDENT EDUCATION — $50,000 · EducationABIINOOJI-AKI INC CULTURAL HEALING CENTER — $40,000 · EducationRogue Climate — $31,977 · EducationTONATIERRA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $30,144 · EducationIndigenous Peoples Power Project Inc — $30,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE AKWESASNE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC — $26,000 · EducationASSOCIATION OF INTERIOR NATIVE EDUCATORS — $24,000 · Education
Other$5,046,023Human Services$2,409,892Arts & Culture$1,718,398Community Improvement$1,387,010Environment$1,067,000Health$774,500Education$587,121

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $313,208 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $241,010 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $223,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetEMMONAK WOMEN'S SHELTER — $200,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetYUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION — $200,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetCihuapactli Collective — $180,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE — $169,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE — $160,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetData for Indigenous Justice — $155,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetAWARE Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetJilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center — $150,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetALASKA WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER — $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetHEALING NATIVE HEARTS COALITION — $150,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $150,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC — $140,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT INC — $136,200 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMESSENGERS FOR HEALTH — $136,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetNATIVE DADS NETWORK INC — $135,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetBlue Bird LifeWays — $125,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTEXAS TRIBAL BUFFALO PROJECT — $120,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $110,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST — $110,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetIMPACT INC — $105,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetREMATRIATION INC — $100,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNative Peoples Action Community Fund — $100,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetCultural Fire Management Council — $100,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetINDIGENOUS WORLD ORGANIZATION — $100,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetNORTHERN CHEYENNE FOOD PANTRY — $100,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetINDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS — $95,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetPIEGAN INSTITUTE — $90,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetURBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE INC — $90,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetCENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTE — $88,760 over 1y, 30% of budgetHaudonosaunee Coalition for Womens Inc — $87,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCalifornia Indian Environmental Alliance — $87,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetManiilaq Association — $86,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY — $85,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA INDIAN BASKETWEAVERS ASSOCIATION — $85,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION — $80,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCHUGACHMIUT — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITING RESILIENCE — $75,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetSalish School of Spokane — $75,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $71,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetOglala Lakota Childrens Justice Center Inc — $70,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetWILD HORSE BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $70,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE — $70,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ndn Collective IncFirst Nations Develop…Common Counsel Founda…Novo FoundationSanta Fe Natural Toba…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Schmidt Family Fo…Rsf Social Finance IncPotlatch FundHumboldt Area Foundat…Northwest Area Founda…Na'ah Illahee Fund
Ndn Collective IncSD141× affinity78 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ndn Collective Inc · First Nations Development Institute · Common Counsel Foundation · Novo Foundation · Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Potlatch Fund · Humboldt Area Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation · Na'ah Illahee Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Northeast Native Network of Kinship and — 44% of income from government
  • Maquam Bay of Missisquoi Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Impact Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Rogue Climate — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc?

Find your warmest path to Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 307 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines