Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ndn Collective Inc

Build the collective power of indigenous peoples, communities, and nations to exercise our inherent right to self-determination, while fostering a world that is built on a foundation of justice and equity for all people and mother earth.

$24M
Granted FY2024still arriving
72
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Civil Rights$13MEnvironment$10MArts & Culture$8.7MCommunity Improvement$8.2MHuman Services$6.4MEducation$5.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.4MFood & Nutrition$1.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 72 grants below total $10,298,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $23,865,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,566,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $803k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $3.0M
  • $250k+19 grants · $6.5M
$50,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ENERGY NEXUS$1,000,000
KUMANO I KE ALA O MAKAWELI$800,000
SPRUCE ROOT INC$540,000
NATIVE CONSERVANCY$450,000
SAGE FOUNDATION INC$250,000
WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE INC$250,000
NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD$250,000
LOWER SIOUX INDIAN COMMUNITY$250,000
WIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND$250,000
PUEBLO OF TESUQUE$250,000
SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC$250,000
DUK DUK GOOSE$250,000
SAGE FOUNDATION INC$250,000
HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE INC$250,000
NIAMUCK LAND TRUST INCORPORATED$250,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 26%CENTER POLE: $250k → 23%LIVING PONO PROJECT: $10k → 9%HOMESTEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50k → 9%WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 11%LUMBEE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC: $200k → 26%MOTHER NATION: $200k → 9%NORTHWEST NATIVE DEVELOPMENT FUND: $50k → 17%THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT: $25k → 12%NATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $15k → 10%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $200k → 6%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $20k → 13%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 26%DAKOTA WICOHAN: $200k → 11%CENTER POLE: $130k → 23%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $100k → 10%PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $200k → 14%WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE: $200k → 11%MOTHER NATION: $100k → 9%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $130k → 6%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD: $250k → 22%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $200k → 26%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $30k → 10%COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $25k → 14%RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $197k → 8%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $20k → 6%HE SAPA OTIPI INC: $1.0M → 14%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD: $90k → 22%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $25k → 26%DAKOTA WICOHAN: $20k → 11%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $25k → 10%HE SAPA OTIPI: $200k → 14%FOUR WINDS AMERICAN INDIAN COUNCIL: $10k → 12%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $20k → 26%MINNEAPOLIS AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER: $75k → 11%NAVA EDUCATION PROJECT: $20k → 14%NATIVE WELLNESS INSTITUTE: $15k → 12%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $200k → 9%AKICHITA YOUTH ATHLETIC ACADEMY INC: $40k → 33%WINYAN WICAYUONIHAN OYANKE-WHERE ALL WOMEN ARE HONORED: $10k → 42%STANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 33%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $150k → 9%STANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 33%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $200k → 12%STANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 33%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $30k → 12%STANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10k → 33%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $3.7M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $2.2M to organizations and $1.5M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$3.7M · 100% · 14 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: COMMUNITY ACTION FUND - PROJECT SUPPORT · COMMUNITY SELF-DETERMINATION - GENERAL SUPPORT · PRESIDENT'S PARTNERSHIP FUND - PROJECT SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33M · 78 repeat orgs$26M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

78 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 52 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
238

Total granted

$33M
$22M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+29%

Still filing today

83%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NATIVE MOVEMENT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +238%
  • NC
    NATIVE CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +203% · 55% of their budget
  • K
    KOIHONUA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +189% · 61% of their budget

Funded once

  • OS
    Oceti Sakowin Community Academygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2.2M · revenue ×16
  • NF
    NDN FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.2M · revenue -80% · 69% of their budget
  • NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
2
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
3
Native Healing Llc
Animals
4
Native American Agriculture Fund
Food & Nutrition
5
Ratiwennahawi Inc

Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans

Education
6
International Indigenous Fund for Development and Solidarity Batani
International
7
Naa Kaani Native Program

The naa kaani native program strives to educate and empower native communities in the pacific norhtwest, with a focus on the salish sea territory. we support cultural events, advocate for tribal rights, and aim to improve lives and…

Community Improvement
8
The Foundation for Indigenous Education Leadership Development
Education
9
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission

Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…

Human Services
10
Native American Fiber Program
Environment
11
Kukolu

As Indigenous peoples, we derive strength from our genealogy, using the past to shape the present and inspire our future. Our mission is to empower our communities by drawing upon their strengths to cultivate economic growth.

Community Improvement
12
The Tiwahe Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen indigenous leadership and cultural identity.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Faha Digital Media Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%13%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%15%<5yr14%27%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
22/356
the rest of the field
13%
240,374/1,819,209

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

277 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 277 of the 357 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

40
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
102
Early backer (in before they grew)
262/277
Grantees still filing
165/277
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROSEBUD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $600,000 · OtherDream of Wild Health — $500,000 · Other+74 more — $13,677,500 · Other+74 moreKOIHONUA — $1,892,000 · Arts & CultureKOIHONUAKUMANO I KE ALA O MAKAWELI — $1,600,000 · Arts & CultureKUMANO I KE ALA O MAK…MICA GROUP INC — $485,000 · Arts & CultureWAMBLI SKA SOCIETY — $455,000 · Arts & CultureBlue Bird LifeWays — $445,000 · Arts & CultureMAHCHIWMINAHNAHTIK CHIPPEWA AND CREE LANGUAGE REVITALIZATION — $400,000 · Arts & CultureAHA PUNANA LEO — $400,000 · Arts & CultureEUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT INC — $400,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE RENEWABLES INC — $400,000 · Arts & Culture+24 more — $4,386,000 · Arts & Culture+24 moreSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $1,971,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATIO…He Sapa Otipi Inc — $1,200,000 · Human ServicesHe Sapa Otipi IncHOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE — $695,000 · Human ServicesHOPI TUTSKWA PERM…WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE — $450,000 · Human ServicesCenter Pole — $380,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC — $350,000 · Human ServicesCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $350,000 · Human ServicesNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD — $340,000 · Human ServicesMother Nation — $300,000 · Human Services+14 more — $2,689,500 · Human Services+14 moreNATIVE MOVEMENT — $2,210,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEMENTNDN FUND INC — $1,200,000 · Community ImprovementNDN FUND INCSPRUCE ROOT INC — $655,000 · Community ImprovementSPRUCE ROOT INCSicangu Community Development Corporation — $400,000 · Community ImprovementNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $400,000 · Community ImprovementMALAMA HULEIA — $400,000 · Community ImprovementWIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND — $300,000 · Community Improvement+18 more — $2,385,000 · Community Improvement+18 moreNATIVE CONSERVANCY — $2,125,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE CONSER…CalCef Innovations — $1,000,000 · EnvironmentCalCef Innova…SAGE FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · EnvironmentSAGE FOUNDATI…RED CLOUD RENEWABLE — $425,000 · EnvironmentRED CLOUD REN…Utah Dine Bikeyah — $300,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $275,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTH — $230,000 · Environment+10 more — $1,609,200 · Environment+10 moreOceti Sakowin Community Academy — $2,200,000 · EducationOceti Sakowi…Purposed Focused Alternative Learning Corporation — $700,000 · EducationPurposed Foc…KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $400,000 · EducationKERES CHILDR…WAADOOKODAADING OJIBWE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE INC — $400,000 · EducationWAADOOKODAAD…TUSWECA TIOSPAYE — $400,000 · EducationTUSWECA TIOS…FRIENDS OF THE AKWESASNE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC — $275,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $270,000 · Education+11 more — $1,553,484 · Education+11 moreOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE — $250,000 · HealthSIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT — $248,000 · HealthCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE — $206,000 · HealthWe Are Healers Inc — $200,000 · HealthGREAT PLAINS TRIBAL LEADERS HEALTH — $100,000 · HealthLAKOTA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT — $85,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC — $80,000 · HealthHIR WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 · Health
Other$14,777,500Arts & Culture$10,863,000Human Services$8,725,500Community Improvement$7,950,000Environment$6,464,200Education$6,198,484Health$1,219,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $2,210,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY — $2,125,000 over 4y, 55% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $1,971,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetKOIHONUA — $1,892,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetKUMANO I KE ALA O MAKAWELI — $1,600,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetNDN FUND INC — $1,200,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetCalCef Innovations — $1,000,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetPurposed Focused Alternative Learning Corporation — $700,000 over 2y, 87% of budgetHOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE — $695,000 over 4y, 54% of budgetSPRUCE ROOT INC — $655,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetDream of Wild Health — $500,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetSAGE FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetInternational Indian Treaty Council Inc — $490,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetMICA GROUP INC — $485,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetWAMBLI SKA SOCIETY — $455,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE — $450,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetBlue Bird LifeWays — $445,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetMakoce Agriculture Development — $425,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetRED CLOUD RENEWABLE — $425,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetSicangu Community Development Corporation — $400,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMAHCHIWMINAHNAHTIK CHIPPEWA AND CREE LANGUAGE REVITALIZATION — $400,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetAHA PUNANA LEO — $400,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $400,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetSITTING BULL COLLEGE — $400,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $400,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetMALAMA HULEIA — $400,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetNATIVE RENEWABLES INC — $400,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetWAADOOKODAADING OJIBWE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE INC — $400,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCenter Pole — $380,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetPolaris Institute USA — $350,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC — $350,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $350,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD — $340,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetWIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND — $300,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetUtah Dine Bikeyah — $300,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetMother Nation — $300,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetNative Peoples Action Community Fund — $290,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetCOUP Council — $285,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER — $280,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetWOZU INC — $280,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE AKWESASNE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC — $275,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $275,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $270,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $250,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNAATSIILID INITIATIVE — $250,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetPLENTY DOORS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $250,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE — $250,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetMANIDOO OGITIGAAN — $250,000 over 2y, 48% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Develop…Seventh Generation Fu…Common Counsel Founda…Northwest Area Founda…Native American Agric…Novo FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Oweesta CorporationThe Schmidt Family Fo…Rsf Social Finance IncWend II IncNdn Foundation Inc
First Nations Development InstituteCO190.9× affinity139 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation · Native American Agriculture Fund · Novo Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Oweesta Corporation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Wend II Inc · Ndn Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ndn Collective Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Nixyaawii Community Financial Services — 100% of income from government
  • Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians Economic Development Corporation — 28% of income from government
  • Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
  • Central Oklahoma American Indian Health Council Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 357 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines