· Private foundation
Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation)
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k63 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $805k
- $250k+29 grants · $11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LANDESA | $600,000 |
| PLANT WITH PURPOSE | $500,000 |
| LUMINOS FUND | $500,000 |
| PROXIMITY DESIGNS | $500,000 |
| MEDIC MOBILE | $500,000 |
| VILLAGE REACH | $500,000 |
| SANKU | $500,000 |
| INTEGRATE HEALTH | $500,000 |
| HEALTHY LEARNERS | $500,000 |
| MUSO | $500,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $425,000 |
| IMAGINE WORLDWIDE | $400,000 |
| LAST MILE HEALTH | $350,000 |
| VISIONSPRING | $350,000 |
| PANORAMA GLOBAL | $350,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
164 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2024, 114 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YLYOUNG LIFE5× · 2019–2023 · $5.5M · revenue +38%
- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION4× · 2019–2023 · $3.8M · revenue +75%
- RDRURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE5× · 2019–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +1%
Funded once
- SCSTONEY CREEK FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $1.5M · revenue -1% · 29% of their budget
- SOSTAR OF HOPE MISSIONone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -64%
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Water to Thrive transforms lives in rural Africa by working with partners and beneficiaries to bring the blessing of clean, safe water, connecting communities in need with supporters who have the heart and spirit to make a difference
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…
Promote peace, democracy and economic prosperity in Africa.
Hope Unlimited inspires hope and renews lives in Kenya and Cameroon by providing access to quality healthcare, clean water, education, economic development and Christian resources for spiritual growth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is Dost Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
196 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 196 of the 384 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds RURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS INC ↗
- Who funds VISIONSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds STONEY CREEK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds MUSO INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE MEDIA GROUP ↗
- Who funds WORLD HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LIVING GOODS ↗
- Who funds Praxis Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends Of Raising The Village Incorporated ↗
- Who funds MEDIC MOBILE INC ↗
- Who funds Alpha USA ↗
- Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
- Who funds MISSION INCREASE ↗
- Who funds VSI ↗
- Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds STRONGMINDS INC ↗
- Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIVOT WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds INKOMOKO ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
- Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MYAGRO FARMS ↗
- Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds NOORA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds UBONGO INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LUMINOS FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Mulago Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · The Skoll Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Skoll Fund · The Iroh Foundation (Fka Ra5 Foundation) · Segal Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Houston Endowment Inc · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.