Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Horne Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$789k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$1.7MAnimals$1.7MHuman Services$530kHealth$374kHousing & Shelter$270kYouth Development$255kEducation$198kFood & Nutrition$195kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $777k
$15,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE STORY OF STUFF$25,000
ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY$25,000
ISLAND PRESS$25,000
NEWHOUSE WILDLIFE CENTER$24,781
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS$21,500
KOPE LION$20,200
ELEVATED THOUGHT FOUNDATION$20,000
CENTER FOR CANINE BEHAVIOR STUDIES$20,000
ELEPHANT SANCTUARY$20,000
SEACOAST YOUTH SERVICES$20,000
GALLATIN RIVER TASK FORCE$20,000
HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES$20,000
EARTH LAW CENTER$20,000
GAINING GROUND$20,000
SIERRA FOOTHILLS CONSERVANCY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $10k → 5%A HUNDRED NIGHTS: $10k → 9%THE CITY SCHOOL: $20k → 16%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 8%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER: $5k → 9%ST GIANNA'S PLACE INC: $5k → 5%HUNDRED NIGHTS INC: $10k → 9%NH CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 7%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 10%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL EXETER: $5k → 5%HOUSEHOLD GOODS INC: $15k → 8%BUDGET BUDDIES: $10k → 16%HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: $20k → 5%COMMUNITY TEAMWORK INC: $15k → 8%THE MOORE CENTER: $10k → 7%ON BELAY: $10k → 5%ON BELAY: $8k → 5%ON BELAY INC: $5k → 5%HOUSING FAMILIES INC: $15k → 8%ON BELAY INC: $5k → 5%STEPPING STONES: $15k → 7%MARGUERITE'S PLACE: $10k → 7%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 10%BUDGET BUDDIES: $10k → 8%BUDGET BUDDIES: $10k → 8%MERRIMACK VALLEY HOSPICE: $15k → 10%CATIE'S CLOSET INC: $10k → 8%CATIE'S CLOSET INC: $5k → 8%PETTENGILL HOUSE: $20k → 10%SAHELI INC: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY GIVING TREE: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY GIVING TREE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 95 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

95 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
207

Total granted

$2.8M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+38%

Still filing today

81%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $537k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    REDFORD CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +176%
  • CO
    COUNCIL OF CONTRIBUTORS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $103k · revenue +229%
  • GG
    GAINING GROUND INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $57k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • SC
    SONOMA COUNTY RESILIENCE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • G
    GLOBIO
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • FZ
    FRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
2
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
3
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
4
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
5
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
6
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
10
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
11
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
12
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center and the most unlike its peers is BACK2EARTH Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Military Veterans SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesCancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Developm…Senior Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/252
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,313

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

248 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 248 of the 333 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
83
Early backer (in before they grew)
238/248
Grantees still filing
188/248
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+94 more — $2,066,783 · Other+94 moreCOUNCIL OF CONTRIBUTORS INC — $103,000 · AnimalsCOUNCIL OF CONTRIBUTORS INCCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $55,000 · AnimalsBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $55,000 · AnimalsGLOBAL CONSERVATION FORCE INC — $50,000 · AnimalsENDANGERED SPECIES COALITION — $45,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $45,000 · AnimalsLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA — $40,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $40,000 · AnimalsEco Defense Group — $40,000 · Animals+31 more — $655,200 · Animals+31 moreREDFORD CENTER INC — $140,000 · EnvironmentREDFORD CENTER INCECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $51,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGY PROJECT INTE…MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentSierra Foothill Conservancy — $30,000 · Environment350 NEW HAMPSHIRE — $30,000 · EnvironmentCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 · Environment+28 more — $534,600 · Environment+28 moreWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesON BELAY INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE — $20,000 · Human ServicesSAHELI INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Pettengill House Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesHUNDRED NIGHTS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesThe City School Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT — $17,500 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesHOUSEHOLD GOODS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING FAMILIES INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCatie's Closet Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Teamwork Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY GIVING TREE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF AINE — $30,000 · HealthVETERINARIANS INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · HealthHOSPICE HELP FOUNDATION — $17,500 · HealthCONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION — $17,500 · HealthAddiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire — $15,000 · HealthFarmsteads of New England Inc — $15,000 · HealthLOWELL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $15,000 · HealthELEVATED THOUGHT INC — $20,000 · EducationWIKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationBLUESKIES WELLNESS INC — $15,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $12,500 · EducationACERA SCHOOL INC — $12,500 · EducationTWIN RIVERS FOOD PANTRY — $27,500 · Food & NutritionMILL CITY GROWS INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LINK INC — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,066,783Animals$1,128,200Environment$845,600Human Services$315,000Health$130,000Education$80,000Food & Nutrition$62,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREDFORD CENTER INC — $140,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF CONTRIBUTORS INC — $103,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetGAINING GROUND INC — $57,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $55,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $51,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBAL CONSERVATION FORCE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetENDANGERED SPECIES COALITION — $45,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA — $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAYHEW — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEco Defense Group — $40,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEARTH LAW CENTER — $35,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE OCEAN SOCIETY FOR MARINE CONSERVATION — $30,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetMERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC — $30,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF AINE — $30,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSierra Foothill Conservancy — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIN OUR HANDS ACTION FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetSPIRIT OF ADVENTURE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #227 — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budget350 NEW HAMPSHIRE — $30,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDANGERED RHINO CONSERVATION — $30,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCheetah Conservation Fund — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS — $30,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTWIN RIVERS FOOD PANTRY — $27,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetON BELAY INC — $27,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCONSERVATION NEBRASKA — $25,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetISLAND PRESS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOXICS ACTION CENTER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Association of State Wetland Managers Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTRANSITION HOUSE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetClean River Project Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPROJECT KOMPASS INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Saab Family Found…New Hampshire Charita…Eastern Bank Foundati…Agnes M Lindsay TrustCummings Foundation G…Cogswell Benevolent T…Madelaine G Vonweber …Essex County Communit…PatagoniaorgRogers Family Foundat…We Share A Common Thr…Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…
The Saab Family FoundationMA59.6× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Saab Family Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Patagoniaorg · Rogers Family Foundation · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Horne Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 280%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans — 66% of income from government
  • Saheli Inc — 61% of income from government
  • Community Action Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Lowell Association for the Blind Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
  • Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Boston Harbor Now Inc — 45% of income from government
  • Act Lawrence Inc — 44% of income from government
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Transition House Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Straight Ahead Ministries Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Community Teamwork Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Walama Restoration Project — 14% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Housing Families Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Community Day Care Center of Lawrence Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Food Link Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Beyond Soccer Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Ywca Northeastern Massachusetts Inc — 5% of income from government
  • The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Catie's Closet Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc — 3% of income from government
  • Tufts Medicine Care at Home Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
  • Women's Money Matters Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
28get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 333 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home