Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Sierra Foothill Conservancy

Sierra Foothill Conservancy (California) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,763,512 to it, the largest being Dorrance Family Foundation ($516,500). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$5.4M
Funders on record
27
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
$39M
12/27 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%
01What it does

What Sierra Foothill Conservancy does

Mission

Protect, manage and preserve lands and wildlife having unique natural resources and cultural qualities within and near the foothills of the sierra nevada range.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. LAND CONSERVATION - Sierra Foothill Conservancy has preserved approximately 64,000 acres in our Service Region that includes Fresno, Madera, and Mariposa Counties. With 10 preserves and 54 conservation easements that highlight the diverse ecology of the Sierra Nevada, SFC has active project development for an additional 2,963.5 acres in 2025 creating connected habitats and expanding the Madera/Mariposa focus area.

    $2,584,997 spent
    68% of program spending
  2. LAND STEWARDSHIP - From the snow-capped Sierra to the Central Valley floor, expansive landscapes, important habitats, and clean water resources are conserved and managed to ensure continuing public benefits. SFC supports a thriving land-based economy while promoting a conservation ethic that spans generations. Funding awards for forest restoration and fuels management, reestablishing blue oak woodlands & ponderosa pines, community engagement to volunteer with plantings, and opportunities for Internships along with partnerships which provide avian, vegetation & carbon monitoring, erosion controls, fig removal.

    $1,013,570 spent
    27% of program spending
  3. EDUCATION & ENGAGEMENT- SFC Education and Outreach offers a variety of opportunities for the public to enjoy and connect to nature. Through our over 100 Hikes and Classes which are led by trained and experienced docents, opportunities to engage in our local conserved lands is a highlight of our Programs. SFC connected more than 6,700 people, from school children to senior citizens with SFC-protected lands. SFC won the prestigious Community Participant Award from the Fresno State Richter Center for our collaborative efforts in education and outreach.Our STEM-based Youth Education Program brings underserved K-12 students from nearby communities to our McKenzie Preserve where they focus on experiential learning that relates to science standards. Our volunteer workdays allow for multi preserve trail work, collaborations with Rotary, and other service groups, Fresno State University and other local schools and universities. Through grant funded partnerships SFC is able to complete trail work and other crucial stewardship tasks on several preserves.

    $148,862 spent
    4% of program spending
  4. Other Program Expenses

    $26,918 spent
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,774,347.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($16M) Expenses 100 ($10M) Net assets 100 ($17M)2018 Revenue 22 ($3.5M) Expenses 31 ($3.1M) Net assets 105 ($17M)2019 Revenue 36 ($5.6M) Expenses 48 ($4.9M) Net assets 113 ($19M)2020 Revenue 169 ($26M) Expenses 176 ($18M) Net assets 167 ($28M)2021 Revenue 73 ($11M) Expenses 105 ($11M) Net assets 194 ($32M)2022 Revenue 35 ($5.5M) Expenses 33 ($3.4M) Net assets 188 ($31M)2023 Revenue 9 ($1.5M) Expenses 18 ($1.8M) Net assets 195 ($32M)2024 Revenue 63 ($9.8M) Expenses 81 ($8.2M) Net assets 215 ($36M)2025 Revenue 35 ($5.4M) Expenses 44 ($4.5M) Net assets 234 ($39M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (35)Expenses (44)Net assets (234)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $19M to $28M (+47%).

$17M
$18M
$19M
$28M
$33M
$32M
$33M
$36M
$39M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 7% · 2018 23% · 2019 6% · 2020 4% · 2021 11% · 2022 16% · 2023 15% · 2024 5% · 2025 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

78% of Sierra Foothill Conservancy’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$5.4M
’17
$342k
’18
$640k
’19
$8.4M
’20
$779k
’21
$2.1M
’22
−$333k
’23
$1.6M
’24
$982k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Bridget Fithian

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed131213131311101111
Joined·+2+1+2+0+0+2+2+0
No longer listed·30202310
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 7 funders to 6 funders, grant income fell $128k → $51k.

10 of 27 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Sierra Foothill Conservancy’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Sierra Foothill Conservancy has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

49% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Sierra Foothill Conservancy.

29%
largest funder
57%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 56% · 2018 74% · 2019 59% · 2020 73% · 2021 35% · 2022 56% · 2023 58% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

29% of Sierra Foothill Conservancy's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Sierra Foothill Conservancy draws 52% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 7 states in all.

MN
MA
CA
MO
AZ
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $312k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Sierra Foothill Conservancy holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin18% · above the median
Months of reserve10.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−12% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding Sierra Foothill Conservancy receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.1M on record.

Federal$2.1M
grants $2.1Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
24
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$2.1M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Sierra Foothill Conservancy

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 11%Fundraising 4%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

86%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Sierra Land Beef · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Sierra Foothill Conservancy: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Sierra Foothill Conservancy?
Sierra Foothill Conservancy (California) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,763,512 to it, the largest being Dorrance Family Foundation ($516,500). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Sierra Foothill Conservancy have?
IRS filings report 27 organizations giving $1,763,512 in grants to Sierra Foothill Conservancy, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Sierra Foothill Conservancy?
Dorrance Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $516,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Sierra Foothill Conservancy find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Sierra Foothill Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 27 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing