· Private foundation
Ken Birdwell Foundation (Dba Magic Cabinet) C/O Clark Nuber Ps
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k99 grants · $245k
- $10k–50k90 grants · $2.0M
- $50k–250k88 grants · $9.2M
- $250k+3 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIVE AMERICANS IN PHILANTHROPY | $1,500,000 |
| DECOLONIZING WEALTH PROJECT | $500,000 |
| LA LIGA DE CIUDADES | $450,000 |
| RAINBOW CENTER | $249,000 |
| COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS | $248,161 |
| FEEST | $230,000 |
| DRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| HOMELESS CHILDREN'S NETWORK | $180,700 |
| MINDFUL LIFE PROJECT | $170,201 |
| EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $170,000 |
| POGO PARK | $169,333 |
| YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED (Y-WE) | $168,667 |
| CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES & IMMIGRANTS | $167,917 |
| COMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS | $167,024 |
| STREET LEVEL HEALTH PROJECT | $166,704 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $9.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FGFIRST GRADUATE6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +55%
- NANORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM5× · 2019–2024 · $875k · revenue +30%
- SSSoutheast Seattle Education Coalition5× · 2020–2024 · $870k · revenue +278% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- SSSEMBRANDO SENTIDO INCone grant, 2023 · $448k · revenue -15% · 82% of their budget
- CFCENTER FOR HABITAT RECONSTRUCTIONone grant, 2023 · $448k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $448k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
APEN builds immigrant and refugee power for a just transition with local roots and statewide impact so all people can live, work, learn, play and thrive in a clean and healthy environment.
Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
Ebase advances economic, racial and social justice by building a just economy in the east bay on good jobs and healthy communities. we address the root causes of economic injustice by developing strategic alliances amount community, faith…
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
Urban Habitat democratizes power and advances equitable policies to create a just and connected Bay Area for low-income communities of color. We confront structural inequities impacting historically disenfranchised communities. Through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Excellence in Nonprofits and the most unlike its peers is Korean Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Native Americans in Philanthropy ↗
- Who funds FIRST GRADUATE ↗
- Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE LATINA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Southeast Seattle Education Coalition ↗
- Who funds Homeless Childrens Network ↗
- Who funds EAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Planting Justice ↗
- Who funds Coalition On Homelessness ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR LEGAL ↗
- Who funds East African Community Services ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS ↗
- Who funds Old Skool Cafe ↗
- Who funds FOOD RUNNERS ↗
- Who funds Pogo Park ↗
- Who funds Zeno ↗
- Who funds CASA LATINA ↗
- Who funds LA COCINA ↗
- Who funds MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH ↗
- Who funds VENTURES ↗
- Who funds CONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds INTERCULTURAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Street Level Health Project ↗
- Who funds Got Green ↗
- Who funds EastSide Arts Alliance ↗
- Who funds Para Los Ninos de Highline ↗
- Who funds Arts Corps ↗
- Who funds Village Community Resource Center ↗
- Who funds SOMALI HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds Mindful Life Project ↗
- Who funds EDEN YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS ↗
- Who funds DRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC ↗
- Who funds Family Resource Navigators ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Medina Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · School's Out Washington · East Bay Community Foundation · Inatai Foundation · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Credit Unions in the State of Washington
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ken Birdwell Foundation (Dba Magic Cabinet) C/O Clark Nuber Ps funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ken Birdwell Foundation (Dba Magic Cabinet) C/O Clark Nuber Ps?
Find your warmest path to Ken Birdwell Foundation (Dba Magic Cabinet) C/O Clark Nuber Ps through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.