California · Nonprofit
CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (California) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,882,151 to it, the largest being THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ($775,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $2.6M
- Funders on record
- 10
- Grants received
- $1.9M
- Net assets
- $2.1M
What Center for Human Development does
Mission
Center for Human Development is a california non-profit corporation dedicated to creating opportunities for people to realize their full potential. Chd operates a spectrum of services for at-risk youth, individuals, families and communities.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
The reducing health disparities program provides services to help community members navigate the county's healthcare system. Navigators assist in establishing ongoing relationships with healthcare providers and advocate for personal responsibility through health education. Chd helps individuals and families apply for publicly funded health benefits, establish a primary healthcare "home" with a doctor or clinic, and talk with their healthcare providers about medical issues.a team of bilingual promatoras also provide outreach and individualized support so community members have the opportunity to apply for health insurance and access other resources through a medi-cal enrollment navigators program.
$926,230 spent39% of program spendingAlcohol and other drugs prevention projects - chd addresses lifelong resiliency for low-income youth at school sites with few resources to reduce risk and factors for using alcohol or drugs, while working to enhance their protective factors. Chd's aods services include prevention education and enviornmental strategies, including project success, the pittsburg-bay point community coalition, and the strengthening families program.
$750,475 spent32% of program spendingYouth empowerment - chd has two specialty programs providing a safe, supportive environment where young people learn, grow, and become active participants in creating positive change, including the empowerment program, a program providing support to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (lgbtq+)youth, and beyond violence, an intervention/prevention program committed to providing help and hope to youth, young adults, and their families who have been victims of violence and trauma.
$296,516 spent13% of program spendingEast county health outreach and education - chd provides opportunities for community members to assess their communities and dedicate their time to projects focused on creating healthier, safer, and more equitable community environments. Staff works collaboratively with community leaders, parents, and other agencies to develop prevention strategies and advocate for positive changes in the community, and to influce public policy. This includes community leaders network (cln) and the african american wellness program.
$266,333 spent11% of program spendingConflict resolution includes community mediation, that provides trained mediators to resolve persistent community conflicts, and guardianship mediation, which offers a calm, bias-free mediation ground for children caught in the middle of estranged parents who are fighting custodial battles. People in the disputed parties play an active role in resolving their cases and shape their own mutual agreements.
$65,203 spent3% of program spendingOther programs related to prevention services.
$40,368 spent2% of program spending
The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,345,125.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.3M to $2.0M (+48%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 93% · 2018 92% · 2019 98% · 2020 88% · 2021 86% · 2022 95% · 2023 99% · 2024 98% · 2025 95%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
David Carrillo
Exec Director
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $7k → $456k.
2 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 9 of 10 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 47% · 2022 100% · 2023 30% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
33% of CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
66% of CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $780k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
99% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT?
- CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (California) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,882,151 to it, the largest being THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ($775,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT have?
- IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $1,882,151 in grants to CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT?
- THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $775,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Center for Human Development →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing