Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM

CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,133 to it, the largest being KEN BIRDWELL FOUNDATION (DBA MAGIC CABINET) C/O CLARK NUBER PS ($1,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$752k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$1k
Grants received
$998k
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 13,726 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−8% · below the median
Months of reserve16.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,726 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($660k) Expenses 100 ($570k) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 87 ($575k) Expenses 91 ($518k) Net assets 94 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 82 ($543k) Expenses 108 ($618k) Net assets 89 ($1.2M)2020 Revenue 77 ($510k) Expenses 111 ($635k) Net assets 86 ($1.1M)2021 Revenue 89 ($589k) Expenses 115 ($658k) Net assets 80 ($1.1M)2022 Revenue 95 ($627k) Expenses 119 ($678k) Net assets 76 ($1.0M)2023 Revenue 115 ($757k) Expenses 126 ($716k) Net assets 79 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 114 ($752k) Expenses 142 ($808k) Net assets 75 ($998k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (114)Expenses (142)Net assets (75)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

3% of CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,844 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$90k
17
$57k
18
$75k
19
$125k
20
$69k
21
$51k
22
$41k
23
$56k
24
17
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $1k → $31.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 88% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

88%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 99% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $133 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $6k on record.

State$6k
21
22
Top programs
  • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NON-IT$6k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

48% of spending goes to programs.

Program 48%Management 52%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM?
CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,133 to it, the largest being KEN BIRDWELL FOUNDATION (DBA MAGIC CABINET) C/O CLARK NUBER PS ($1,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $1,133 in grants to CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM?
KEN BIRDWELL FOUNDATION (DBA MAGIC CABINET) C/O CLARK NUBER PS is the largest funder on record, with $1,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CROSS CULTURAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing